🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Decriminalising abortion up to birth does not protect women. It does the opposite. Instead we must stop the ‘pills by post’ scheme. I support Dr Caroline Johnson MP ‘s amendment to reinstate in person consultations before abortion pills are prescribed.

Tomorrow Parliament will vote on whether to allow abortion to birth. These extreme amendments are supposedly intended to stop the prosecution of women who conduct their own late term abortions. But there’s a reason these prosecutions have increased in recent years - it’s

This national inquiry is a hard-won victory for the brave survivors who refused to be silenced — who gave up their anonymity to expose the institutions that failed them. Labour fought it every step of the way. They voted against it. Mocked campaigners. Smeared them. Branded it a

“We will see women die as a result of this.” Decriminalising abortion “does not protect women at all” says Conservative MP Rebecca Paul MP, who is voting against the amendment in parliament. Kate McCann | #TimesRadio

'Only 1% of the public think that abortion should be legal to birth, and yet it looks like 70% of MPs are going to vote for these measures!' Miriam Cates details the amendment that could see abortion up to 40 weeks become legal.

This is the biggest change to reproductive rights law in 58 years and yet it was voted on without a committee stage, with no evidence session, just 46 mins of backbench debate that was then ended by a government minister who refused to take a single intervention. We can do

I’m devastated by the decision taken by Parliament this evening. I truly hope I’m wrong on this, because if I’m not, many vulnerable women and third trimester babies will be harmed.

I voted no. I am pro-choice, but can scarcely believe that after just 46 rushed minutes of backbench debate in which only 13 MPs gave speeches, Parliament voted to decriminalise abortions of healthy babies up to full-term. Labour MPs cheered when the vote passed.

The Speaker has confirmed that only five 'non Kim' amendments will be voted on on Friday. All these elements of the Bill are now permanent. A 'yes' vote at Third Reading is to accept: 🚨Any doctor can raise ending a patient's life, no matter how vulnerable the patient,

🧵 I’ve spent months scrutinising the Assisted Dying Bill — line by line at committee stage. This bill does not do what it says on the tin. ⚠️ This bill is a danger to public safety. It leaves serious loopholes including for people with Anorexia. Here’s why MPs must vote

This is a much needed amendment. Shocking they voted it down. So much for their commitment to halve violence against women and girls.

Today, the Conservative Party voted on a 2-line whip against decriminalising self-induced abortion up to full term in the Crime and Policing Bill. Yesterday, I gave Conservative MPs the opportunity to express a free vote, because the convention has been to treat abortion as a

If the Assisted Dying Bill passes we will scrutinise it seriously. But elected MPs should be clear that as it is a PMB, amdmts are likely to be limited. MPs MUST be satisfied that the Bill in front of them on Friday is fit for purpose - if they are not, they should not pass it.

I didn’t come into politics to make things easier just for those used to having choices and freedoms but to speak up for those who don’t. That is why with regret I cannot vote for this bill.

1/ MPs have been told that Kim Leadbeater is backing Amendment 14 to address the anorexia loophole. That’s NOT what the amendment does. On the eve of the vote, many Members still don’t appear to understand what they’re being asked to vote on. An explainer below 🧵

Thank you to everyone who fought to bring back our Freedom of Speech Act. This is why we did it. An important win for free speech and academic freedom.

I will be supporting this very sensible amendment.

I am a palliative care doctor who is not opposed to AD. But on the eve of tomorrow's vote, it boils down to this. Enshrining in law a state-funded right to die, while not enshrine a similar right to the palliative care that might make life worth living, is deeply wrong. 🧵

Please, MPs, before you vote on tomorrow’s AD bill, I beg you to ask yourselves why the Royal College of Psychiatrists felt compelled to publicly oppose it…. Ask yourselves why the vast majority of palliative care doctors, geriatricians & groups representing people with disabilities, eating

A truly sad day. For the second time this week, I truly hope I’m wrong about it.