Ethical lapses in ""Computational studies on the regioselectivity of metal-catalyzed synthesis of 1,2,3 triazoles via click reaction: a review" " biochemicalmatters.blogspot.com/2018/10/a-warn…

"Obscure" journals sometimes have the best peer-review zpr.io/6Le4u

Christmas is early this year!

This is my favourite festive GDPR gag of Christmas 2018 so far.

looking for Mitchell's privatkey published "Chemiosmotic coupling and energy transduction" (1968) No copies within a 1000 km radius nor on the web. can you help me? #icanhazpdf

Optical illusions: color perception youtu.be/kY4VVfVnKlA via YouTube

Barely 5 weeks since publication, already 100 downloads of my 'New insights into the mechanism of Schiff base synthesis from aromatic amines in the absence of acid catalyst or polar solvents' article published in #OpenAccess journal PeerJ Organic Chemistry peerj.com/articles/ochem…

new year's resolutions, 4 months in... biochemicalmatters.blogspot.pt/2016/04/planne… …

Are you willing to write a short scientific autobiography? biochemicalmatters.blogspot.com/2016/04/scient…

The PeerJ editorial process explainer -

Wanna publish in my favorite journal? I have 3 discount codes valid for 60 days from PeerJ Publishing. 2 mos from 1st submission to publication!

ChemistrySelect is a new "impact-neutral" journal for Chemistry. Currently free to read. goo.gl/kdD6nh

My new preprint on some unresolved issues from 10.1021/jacs.5b03836 and 10.1002/prot.23022 peerj.com/preprints/2145… Comments welcome :-)

Journalists do not care if a study is peer-reviewed, non-reviewed , a preprint or from a "glamour" pub. (1/2)

They only care about one thing: will this get clicks/views? Truth or trustworthiness do not count (2/2)

:-) x.com/ChrisBrosnahan…

My critique of 10.1021/jacs.5b03836 has just been published. peerj.com/articles/2805/… Extra info is present in its peer-review history

What would you do if you were reviewing a paper where the author cites 23 of his 25 publications? biochemicalmatters.blogspot.com/2017/07/today-… #peerreview

Common-sense is not always abundant when replying to peer-reviewers. Whatever you do, please DO this: biochemicalmatters.blogspot.com/2017/10/some-c…