Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯ (@markroseman) 's Twitter Profile
Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯

@markroseman

Fighting systemic rot in healthcare. Independent and unapologetic generalist, writer, philosopher, entrepreneur. Recovering multidisciplinary technology geek.

ID: 14133200

linkhttps://www.markroseman.com calendar_today12-03-2008 16:21:51

19,19K Tweet

1,1K Followers

591 Following

Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯ (@markroseman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What's missing from the whole "just let physicians go private" narrative in Canada is that we currently have NO standards or metrics for public access to care. We leave reporting to the govt comms people who cherry pick data and spin closures as enhancing patient care.

Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯ (@markroseman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We know diverting scarce resources from the public system will affect care. How low is too low as far as access in the public system goes? We have no reliable way to track that. But I'd argue we're already below minimum acceptable standard.

Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯ (@markroseman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The bogeyman of the US health system isn't a reason to reject private care altogether. But without transparency around the public system, that's what we'll have. Want a parallel private system alongside an accessible public system? Push for accountability of public care.

Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯ (@markroseman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Kevin Mcleod Agreed. Transparency and accountability in the public systemβ€”getting it to the point it meets SOME minimum standardβ€”should be an absolute prerequisite before we embark on this insane journey. Private care could supplement a core public system, but it shouldn't replace it.

Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯ (@markroseman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Want two-tier medicine in Canada? Try restoring confidence in the public tier of our health system. Then we'd be happy to talk. Our current zero-one tier ("feeling lucky today?") isn't the answer. But neither is a one-tier private system.

Johnsemalhuis (@johnsemalhuis) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Jennifer Lloyd, PhD I wasn't . I was deadly serious. In BC there has been little if any attempt to engage full service family physicians and ask what they actually need. The current LFP plan that was to save us all (patients and physicians) was negotiated in secret with the MoH and so far as I know

alan drummond (@alandrummond2) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We live in a weird world of anti-science and disinformation. Who knew Canadian provincial governments would be more than willing participants. The science is clear, and has been for decades, inadequate hospital capacity = ER boarding = LWBS and in some cases, premature death.

We live in a weird world of anti-science and disinformation.
Who knew Canadian provincial governments would be more than willing participants.
The science is clear, and has been for decades, inadequate hospital capacity = ER boarding = LWBS and in some cases, premature death.
Proud Canadian (@markbenjam93537) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mark Roseman Canadians would love to have the same access to healthcare that are political class and various other people under these affected groups. So put your virtue signal aside and see that we already have two tier healthcare. It needs to be brought out in the open and discussed.

<a href="/markroseman/">Mark Roseman</a> Canadians would love to have the same access to healthcare that are political class and various other people under these affected groups. So put your virtue signal aside and see that we already have two tier healthcare. It needs to be brought out in the open and discussed.
Mark Roseman πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈπŸ™„β˜•οΈπŸ–₯ (@markroseman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A hybrid system with a functioning public tier is worth considering. That's NOT what we're talking about here. If there's no floor on public system performance (access to ER's, primary care, other basic services), we don't have a health system. We have a fucking lottery.

Jon Meddings (@jmeddings) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mark Roseman I agree with this analysis. Money is money, whether private or tax funded. We need to pay for more care to achieve a dream of universal access. That should be taxes. After we have that we can discuss better access for either some or all and how you fund it.

Jon Meddings (@jmeddings) 's Twitter Profile Photo

An important statement. Lab Med experts repeatedly warned government about the follies of privatizing with Dynalife. Government didn't listen. What? Our government *not* listening to well thought out expert advice?? Whatever next...

Alberta Medical Association (AMA) (@albertadoctors) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"Failing to plan is planning to fail." Alberta's health care system currently lacks the precursors that must be in place for success in balancing public and private care. albertadoctors.org/news/publicati…

"Failing to plan is planning to fail." 
Alberta's health care system currently lacks the precursors that must be in place for success in balancing public and private care. albertadoctors.org/news/publicati…
Kaitlin Stockton (@mdmama_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Better access to emergency care is attainable and relatively cost-neutral. It takes better transparency, defined accountability, independent oversight, and respect for our frontline providers. cbc.ca/news/marketpla…