With the cover all set, I am thrilled to announce my upcoming book: A Rights-Based Inter-Legal Approach to Artificial Intelligence (Hart Publishing) As AI systems shape public governance, their impact on fundamental rights is more critical than ever. I argue the limits of

Maybe because it has very little to do with the brain per se ? 😎😊

Barriers to Entailment should be out in paperback on 22nd August (Nov 22nd in the US.) Available in all good bookshops, and some bad ones too. global.oup.com/academic/produ…

Nothing has worked in fixing birth rates. Financial incentives didn’t work (Hungary), Nordic socialism didn’t work (Scandinavia), restricting women’s rights didn’t work (Iran), totalitarianism didn’t work (North Korea), doing nothing didn’t work (Latin America). What will work?

I just finished writing about What Is Philosophy? for Deleuze and Polytheism. In addition to Deleuze and Guattari’s overt mentions of gods in that text, I found many implicit, but distinct, resonances with concepts from Deleuze’s earlier texts explicitly interwoven with the gods.

I am back to Copenhagen, and I'm sinking in endorphines 🪷🪷🪷

Every woman after some age must own pink jeans kids.

Not all people have developed high iq, many were busy with other stuff - this is why ethics (of AI) gets popular, this is why marxism was, and many other awful things with devastating consequences

arstechnica.com/science/2025/0…

agree?

exactly this, and more about

Denmark supports Ukraine: "wait, Swedish betrayed you in 1600s and that's how it all went left?? Had to remind us earlier. And you guys like pork and don't make noise all the time like Southern Europeans??? We need this Europe. We help you"

"The search for objectivity is but objectification" Kallinikos, Technology and Society, 1996

"______ is outdated, monstrous, and entirely illegal". Many things right? Or we should help them become

The assigned readings in my intro ethics class are public philosophy, at the bleeding edge of cultural and technological change—where each side of a debate has a reasonable case. Here are the previous assigned readings. What topics should I cover this time around? What readings?

have I told you already guys? LLM seems like a huge apology for empiricism and all that objectivist science and linear equations as ultimate truth..

so all philosophers of science are basically men right? one more fence there? guess why

so guys we are not talking about capital are we? social, cultural, I remember it was a thing when I was at school

so guys Norbert Wiener (the name means "from Vienna"?) he was the first author to ask men not only speak but also listen sometimes (rhetoric art vs feedback in communication).

So guys, this ideology of "care for the inner child's wounds" averts you from joy and creative potential and the most important, from willingness to connect, to a small self bubble.