Efilism
@efilvenky74
Pessimist | Anti-Nature | Efilism | Antinatalism | Anti-Religion | Anti-Wage slavery | Anti-Carnism | Painless Promortalist
ID: 1673708161725865985
27-06-2023 15:01:59
12,12K Tweet
590 Followers
269 Following
Edward A. Perin - Psychologist Why should people not be entitled to freely end their life as a fundamental human right? Do you believe that people should come into existence as the property of and slaves to the state / society? Why do you liken allowing someone to make their own choice about life and death
Daily Mail What a cruel, exploitative and selfish family, to want to force him to stay alive in an existence that caused him misery, in order to spare them suffering. Even if he hadn't been allowed MAiD, he should have severed ties with such a toxic family.
Salvatore Mattera We wouldn't need doctors to be facilitating death through the healthcare service if access to reliable and humane methods were not restricted and people did have the right to end their lives. So as long as the government denies people this right, this is a question of whether you
Wokecrates It's not forcing MAiD on anyone. The problems in accessing resources would still persist if MAiD was banned. As it does in numerous countries where MAiD is still illegal. The countries that ban MAiD aren't all socialist paragons of disability justice, either.
Breeding creates extinctionists. Corrupted World ๐๐บ๏ธ๐คข
Autism Capital ๐งฉ Completely agree. If the state can force us to remain alive by banning access to all humane and reliable suicide methods, then that effectively makes us the property (ergo slaves) of the state. That's abusive by design, and the ultimate abuse at that. So I'm unmoved by all of the
Andrew Lyerly โฆ๏ธ The Redheaded libertarian If the current suicide prevention activities of the government aren't effective barriers, then what is your argument against allowing privately owned and operated suicide pods to be available to anyone who wants to use them (and hasn't done anything to deserve the loss of