Efilism (@efilvenky74) 's Twitter Profile
Efilism

@efilvenky74

Pessimist | Anti-Nature | Efilism | Antinatalism | Anti-Religion | Anti-Wage slavery | Anti-Carnism | Painless Promortalist

ID: 1673708161725865985

calendar_today27-06-2023 15:01:59

12,12K Tweet

590 Followers

269 Following

Kevin (@nihilistboy2) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Everytime I experience or have to do something unappealing, stressful or displeasurable I have to spoil myself or do something I find extremely pleasurable right after to balance it out.

Earthling (@thehumandilemma) 's Twitter Profile Photo

โ€œCherry trees in bloom. Beautiful, pointless, and soon gone. Like everything else. Still stared at them for an hour.โ€ โ€” Schopenhauer

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Edward A. Perin - Psychologist Why should people not be entitled to freely end their life as a fundamental human right? Do you believe that people should come into existence as the property of and slaves to the state / society? Why do you liken allowing someone to make their own choice about life and death

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Karen Jason Kenney ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Well I hope not. It's phenomenally popular, and with good reason. It turns out that people like having more sovereignty over their life, rather than an overreaching paternalistic government protecting them from themselves all the time.

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Marissa By infantilising people through paternalistic and coercive modes of suicide prevention, you're reinforcing this prejudice that suicidal people can't think for themselves and reinforcing the idea that it is therefore something that one should be ashamed of. It's extremely

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Daily Mail What a cruel, exploitative and selfish family, to want to force him to stay alive in an existence that caused him misery, in order to spare them suffering. Even if he hadn't been allowed MAiD, he should have severed ties with such a toxic family.

Voxvacui (@voxvacui) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The highest form of unsatisfactoriness is the desire for an afterlife: as long as fools fail to understand that needs and wants cannot be satisfied, they will desire to satisfy the unsatisfiable indefinitely.

Voxvacui (@voxvacui) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The ubiquity of music in cities testifies to the inability of the human mind to endure the pain of silence that reveals the emptiness of existence.

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Kayla Pollock Viva Frei @KelsiBurns Not having MAiD as a legal option will not fix one of the issues that you've mentioned. It just means that if you're not getting the support that you need now, you'd be forced to continue like that until you died naturally.

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Salvatore Mattera We wouldn't need doctors to be facilitating death through the healthcare service if access to reliable and humane methods were not restricted and people did have the right to end their lives. So as long as the government denies people this right, this is a question of whether you

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Wokecrates It's not forcing MAiD on anyone. The problems in accessing resources would still persist if MAiD was banned. As it does in numerous countries where MAiD is still illegal. The countries that ban MAiD aren't all socialist paragons of disability justice, either.

Voxvacui (@voxvacui) 's Twitter Profile Photo

People get bored alone. Then they find a partner and grow bored together. Then they have children and grow bored together. In trying to escape boredom, they multiply it.

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Autism Capital ๐Ÿงฉ Completely agree. If the state can force us to remain alive by banning access to all humane and reliable suicide methods, then that effectively makes us the property (ergo slaves) of the state. That's abusive by design, and the ultimate abuse at that. So I'm unmoved by all of the

existentialgoof (@existentialgoof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Andrew Lyerly โ˜ฆ๏ธ The Redheaded libertarian If the current suicide prevention activities of the government aren't effective barriers, then what is your argument against allowing privately owned and operated suicide pods to be available to anyone who wants to use them (and hasn't done anything to deserve the loss of

Apatheia โ“‹ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ (@dankellyfreedom) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The left has always been either ignorant and stupid (useful idiots who would unwittingly engage in gross hypocrisy), or evil (power seekers). For an elaborate example of evil, read The Gulag Archipelago. Nothing has changed.

Efilism (@efilvenky74) 's Twitter Profile Photo

According to the general public - Killing someone painlessly with their consent is wrong. - Killing someone painfully with a natural death without their consent is right.