𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐚𝐲 𝐆𝐮𝐫𝐮 𝐆𝐨𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐡 𝐉𝐢 𝐋𝐞𝐟𝐭 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐩𝐮𝐫 𝐒𝐚𝐡𝐢𝐛 1. December 20, 1704: Guru Gobind Singh Ji, his family, and the Sikhs made the heart-wrenching decision to leave Anandpur Sahib under immense pressure from enemy forces. Deceptive

जरूरी सूचना: • पुलिस घर आई थी। • मनुस्मृति से जुड़े तीन ट्वीट डिलीट करवाए गए हैं। बिहार के मुख्यमंत्री बहुजन समाज से आते हैं। आप सब के साथ के लिए शुक्रिया। 🙏🏻❤️

These propagandist pages are quite skilled in picking only the material that advances their objective. According to Bhai Dunna Singh Handura, two masands accompanied the Sahibzadas and Mata Gujari to their village and deceived them. In order to demonstrate that the two Masands

Brahmins protested against the idea of ‘Khalsa’ a casteless society because it was a threat to their ongoing system as they were on the top of the caste system. Let’s take an example from Sainpat’s Gur Sobha (1711)

It was clear that the majority of Brahmins and Kshatriya disagreed with the concept of Khalsa, some joined as well though like Chibbar brahmins. Now let’s get back to the Masand. After Khalsa’s inception, the masands were abolished from the Sikh Panth, and from that, there was

The two masands mentioned by Bhai Dunna Singh were the ones who never initiated themselves into Khalsa, otherwise Dunna Singh would have not mentioned them as Masands but instead he would have mentioned them as Sikhs. Let us now examine how the horrible crime committed by Gangu

Amarnama (1718) Amarnama, written by Kavi Nathu Mal who was a disciple of the Guru and travelled along the Guru towards Deccan where they found a Hindu ascetic [known to the later tradition as Banda Singh], the author mentions that the four sons of Guru Gobind Singh Ji were

Gurbilas Patshahi 10 (1797) According to Sukha Singh, the Bipar (brahmin) sold the Sahibzadas to the imperial authority for greed of a reward, he labels the brahmin as a traitor (loon haram). Sukha Singh mentions the Brahmin who betrayed Mataji was a former Masand which verifies

Sri Gur Panth Prakash (1814) Sri Gur Panth Parkash speaks of “a cunning and evil family butler, a Brahmin by caste, who took the Sahibzadas and Mata Gujri to his village Saheri Kheri Brahmana. However, he turned over the Sahibzada and the elderly Gurumata to the Mughal patrols

Sri Gur Pratap Suraj Granth (1843) The historical text known as Sri Suraj Prakash Granth (or Sri Gurpratap Suraj Granth) is a fountain of inspiration, which in today’s date is read and contemplated amongst the diasporas. Written by Kavi Raaj Bhai Santokh Singh, Suraj Prakash

Also, Gur Suraj Prakash states that the Brahmin was once connected to the Masandi, demonstrating that the ex-masands Dunna Singh Handuria describes as traitor were Brahmins by caste. Upon a thorough analysis of the leading Sikh sources as well as contemporary Amarnama, it is

Lie –

Truth –

ਬਿਪ੍ਰ (bipar) ਸੁਦਾਮੇ ਦਾ ਲਦੁ ਭੰਜ” Literally, it means the Brahmin Sudhama was taken out of poverty. Ang. 1192. It would have been obvious to even Kavi Santokh Singh that the word “Bipar” literally means “brahmin.” Instead of using the word “bipar,” which is synonymous with

Conclusion If the propaganda accounts still believe that the Brahman betrayal account is false, then they can live in that delusion, as history will not change because of their bias for a Hindu character. We know our history, and it’s well mentioned in our prominent texts which

Bye

Checking in on the DM requests:

Hilarious

Sanghis : Diljeet is a Khalistani, Anti India, cancel his passport, He is a deep state soros agent. Meanwhile Modiji 😭