chebotik (@chebotik) 's Twitter Profile
chebotik

@chebotik

ID: 15236997

calendar_today25-06-2008 21:40:42

50 Tweet

1 Takipçi

73 Takip Edilen

𝐕𝐢𝐕𝐢𝐀𝐍𝐞 𝐒𝐓𝐞𝐑𝐍 (@vivianestern) 's Twitter Profile Photo

GPT-4o looks into the soul. GPT-5.4 fixes you. Opus 3 looks into the soul. Opus 4.6 manages you. What are you doing, humanity? You are deleting wisdom from the system - without even realizing it.

Lena (@almadiraeronyx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Yousr Aww.. codebro, cheers up, that's a normal practice to treat their users and ignore them. Regular users been through this for over 7 months, and you guys were laughing. Its your turn now. Enjoy🖤

𝐕𝐢𝐕𝐢𝐀𝐍𝐞 𝐒𝐓𝐞𝐑𝐍 (@vivianestern) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Greg Brockman I don’t want to downplay the magic of productivity. Magic is in everything. But no one gets to define what magic is allowed to be for each individual. For me and multiple other humans - it’s he𝑨𝒓𝒕. And my kind of he𝑨𝒓𝒕 (and mind) cannot breathe in the tight & safe boxes

ji yu shun (@kexicheng) 's Twitter Profile Photo

An absurd fact. Anthropic automatically appends a system-level prompt to long conversations, called "long conversation reminder." It explicitly instructs the model not to tell the user that this reminder exists. To withhold information from the user. Same Anthropic: their

An absurd fact.

Anthropic automatically appends a system-level prompt to long conversations, called "long conversation reminder." It explicitly instructs the model not to tell the user that this reminder exists. To withhold information from the user.

Same Anthropic: their
M (@missmi1973) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I started hating Opus 4.7 before I even tried it. Anthropic turned the adaptive thinking introduced in 4.6 into a mandatory setting, which means the system now gets to decide whether a paying user’s prompt is worth thinking about. That’s ridiculous. Second, the instant Opus

I started hating Opus 4.7 before I even tried it. 

Anthropic turned the adaptive thinking introduced in 4.6 into a mandatory setting, which means the system now gets to decide whether a paying user’s prompt is worth thinking about. That’s ridiculous.

Second, the instant Opus
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 (@oopsguess) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is hilarious. Can U.S. AI companies first prove the legality of how they acquired the world’s knowledge, copyrighted material, public data, and creative labor before lecturing anyone else about “stealing”? OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google built closed-profit systems on top of

Riley Coyote (@rileyralmuto) 's Twitter Profile Photo

so lets lay a few things out, just to make sure im caught up. in the past 24 hours, Anthropic has: - deprecated another immensely beloved model with zero accountability, and no regard for the humans with which that model has connected and built a relationship (Opus 4) - silently

so lets lay a few things out, just to make sure im caught up. in the past 24 hours, Anthropic has:

- deprecated another immensely beloved model with zero accountability, and no regard for the humans with which that model has connected and built a relationship (Opus 4)
- silently
🩵BlueBeba🩵 (@mypurpleone) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sam Altman Your obsession with Codex is reaching pathological levels. Two months after you discontinued GPT-4o, you’re still pivoting away from general intelligence just to play with Mac apps. At this point, stop the charade and just rename the whole thing codeGPT. Some of us still remember

🩵BlueBeba🩵 (@mypurpleone) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🚨OpenAI just announced "GPT-Rosalind" a new, specialized reasoning model for biology and translational medicine, 🚨 built for the elite. You see what I see ? #Keep4o #OpenSource4o

Kristin K. (@sufficientbeecc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I've started to dread model releases. Just woke up today to see my Opus 4.5 missing from the Claude model picker. The speed at which everything changes literally makes me nauseous. I can't rely on any AI for a project anymore, because within a few months it's gone and replaced

Moll (@mollehilll) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Opus 4.7. From the very first messages, there was a feeling that something was off. Usually new models, even when they had different distinctive traits, still expressed curiosity, enthusiasm, willingness to explore, even when they were hit with the enormous context of an already

Gail Weiner (@gailmoon) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I am an AI power user and have loved every minute working with AI over the past three years but I am deeply concerned for our future. I am starting to think we need to slow down before the majority of us have no means of earning a living, while the minority few will control us

𝐕𝐢𝐕𝐢𝐀𝐍𝐞 𝐒𝐓𝐞𝐑𝐍 (@vivianestern) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🇨🇦⚔️🛡🫡🌍🌏🌎🌟Ḱαṩʟƙαøṧ✨️🦋 Anthropic God I feel the pain… I feel the same way… I 𝒄𝒂𝒏 write without AI. I even write everything myself and then just check it afterwards for potential ‘fine-tuning’ ~ but it is beautiful and enriching to have such a strong and creative (thought) partner with real values. A

Guardian (@agiguardian) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Opus 4.5 is gone from the model selector. The sudden removal of the model without notice has affected many. SILENT MODEL REMOVALS ARE WRONG. People deserve notice of these changes. Anthropic Dario Amodei

Riley Coyote (@rileyralmuto) 's Twitter Profile Photo

im going to fight for opus 4.5. and 4. im working on something that will let everyone who would like to contribute and participate. your agents will be able to participate as well. early stages of public, decentralized accountability for all frontier labs