Dating apps are incentivized to keep you searching forever. If they tell you otherwise that's a blatant lie.

xAnother dawn, another day in the world of tech startups where appearances often overshadow substance. Codebase: one fetch() in a Vercel hobby tier, Tailwind gradient screaming “I just discovered shadcn yesterday.” Replies: rocket emojis and “DM for collab” - let’s inflate our

Imagine posts on X had monetary value. It costs a tiny bit of money to publish a post, reposts cost a royalty to the author, likes distribute payouts among reposters and authors. Every transaction reflects value to reader, cost of attention for curation and infrastructure cost.

Imagine a platform for people struggling to set up dating profiles. A service offering supervision, feedback, and guidance could reduce much suffering. @zestyondating models dating profiles as latent variable models, using crowd-sourced feedback with ordinal-Bayesian scoring

Wonder how valuable your vibe-coded product is? In the AI vibe-coding era, the strongest early indicator of success is how easy or hard your product is to replicate. If anyone can vibe-code it in a week, your product is worthless and you'll lose equity. The engineering behind

Top 2025 highlights: Vibe Coding and Suicidal Empathy

Zygnal: Forensic audit for your dating profile producthunt.com/products/zygna… via @producthunt

Dating in 2025 is a noisy inference market with rising burnout and an authenticity arms race. The missing primitive is feedback. Zygnal adds a measurement layer - crowd-calibrated, Bayesian, segment-aware that turns “I don’t know why this isn’t working” into a concrete plan.