10 clues someone on social media is seeking self-defense over truth: When you engage them to find out their reasons, they: 1. They lack genuine curiosity. The posture is defensive or attacking, not exploratory. Maybe they feel threatened. 2. They drift into ad hominem. Instead

EFS, ESS, and ERAS are neither biblical nor catholic. They represent a Trinitarian error arising from biblicist and rationalist impulses rather than from the Church’s received confession. As the Athanasian Creed rightly teaches: “Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and

This is spot on! Washer is not even remotely Reformed. He uses fear as the engine to sanctification. For him, assurance is based on your fruit. He is the theological offspring of Johnny Mac. Say no to Lordship and yes to the Law/ Gospel distinction.

If you missed the livestream of Day 3 of the Anglican Diocese of the Rocky Mountains 2026 Gathering, our pastor preached the sermon for Morning Prayer. You can listen to his message here: youtube.com/live/0TfX0GeX3… Where Are You? — Clothed in Christ, Our Good Shepherd-King

Jesus is the center of the story. He was prefigured by types and shadows but he was literally God and man, he literally obeyed in our place, he literally died on a literal cross, he was literally raised on the third day. He literally ascended on the third day. He's literally at

"It is true that Scripture calls for complete obedience (1 Pe 1:16; Mt 5:48; Jas 1:4). Nevertheless, the question again is whether “ought implies can.” It is one thing to say that the regenerate commit themselves to holiness and are able, by God’s grace, to yield their body to

The latest Heidelvideo is up, have you watched it yet? Check out this clip, and click the link for more! R. Scott Clark @heidelblog01 @heidelbergrefo1 youtu.be/QqPZulFdjDI?si…

🎯

Mr. Final Justification is causing outrage. He is an expert a butchering the scriptures. Unfortunately, his views on justification should have caused even more outrage, since the Gospel is at stake.

🎯🎯🎯🔥🔥🔥👏👏👏

Come learn what the rainbow is really about.

Much of the recent critique of Kline and R2K misses the level at which Kline is actually operating. His project was never a political theory. It was an exegetical architecture— an attempt to read the covenants, the canon, and redemptive history with eschatological integrity.

🎯🎯🎯

In 2018, after what was supposed to be a mundane surgery, I nearly bled to death, post-op. Instead of being discharged the next morning, I spent a few days in ICU. I had been a Christian for over 20 years and a pastor for almost 10. That night, which I genuinely thought was my

From "Gospel Assurance"

Good Works and Assurance: Calvin’s A Posteriori Principle John Calvin teaches that good works play a role in assurance only a posteriori—that is, after faith has already rested entirely on God’s mercy in Christ. Works can strengthen faith, but only as secondary testimonies that

Antinomianism denies the third use of the law and the believer’s grateful obligation to obey. If you label as antinomian a clear law/gospel distinction, Christ-grounded assurance, and justification apart from obedience, then your neonomian reflexes are kicking in.

The solution to "easy believism" is not "hard believism." #believe #rest #receive #trust

This is blasphemy!