Grown ahh man btw took the time to type this thinking id have a heart attack

7 PM CST tonight Call in on Tiktok! Bryce James

Argument from motion smacks the silly out of atheists especially when ran like St Maximus.

Hey! Any orthodox christians who think St Augustine taught filioque Give me a single father (St Photius 800 AD -> 1900 AD) That believed St Augustine taught it, if you cant, you concede you hold a liberal position 🗣

My point is that all of the fathers that do speak about augustine, they say that he did not teach it. St Photius, Gregory Cyprus II, St Maxim the Greek, St Gregory Palamas, St Mark of Ephesus, St Gennadius And tons more Sounds like consensus of the fathers to me easily.

Same woman who said that: - the Dormition/ Assumption of the Blessed Mother wasn’t dogma in her materially heretical book. - we don’t have canon law -1642, 1672 were not authoritative - doctrine revolves around phronema, and not the apostolic deposit

Hesychasm is not advaita vedanta or dzogchen. It is the Holy Spirit Himself praying within the human person deeply inside from the heart. He prays automatically with your heart and mind over time when you are in full participation in the liturgical-sacramental life of the Church.

youtube.com/live/6PnDSs46x… Formally debating Metaphysics Mike tonight at 8 PM CST on the biblical and logical account of the hypostatic union! Be there!!

Watch me contradict St Maximus speedrun

Come back to brycecord habibi 🥀🥀❤️

Tractate 92 (on John 15:26 Augustine) he believes (and most fathers and scholars agree) the the sending of the refers to economia, and in turn, denotes a different mode of procession than from the Father, if you follow the fathers logic, you make them affirm two principles.

He obviously doesn't believe that all economic relations entail eternal relations, See here. The way you interpret him causes all of the persons to cause each other in the Trinity. So that doesn't work either.

Father Seraphim held augustine to a very high regard. So I would not say he's a modernist. I believe the way it was denoted at toledo was fine, and was the clarification on the operational order of the trinity. I believe the latin view began in St Photios time.

As you keep quoting things, you ignore my point. If temporal sending necessitates eternal relations, then the one that I sent you, entails that the Father and the Holy Spirit beget the son with St Augustine. Do you affirm this???

Metaphysics Mike Says he could have been the SAVIOR in another possible world?!? This is what unitarianism leads too😳

If St Augustine had Mani in his heart for his theological assumptions about sin and atonement, then St Maximus the Confessor still has neonplatonism in his heart and we "should be careful accepting his teachings". Philosophy can be baptised by fathers btw.

Id rather die by the caliphate than accept a false doctrine for "unity"

The east actually always held that they had a different god. There was a synod around 1150 that decreed "Anathema to the god of Muhammad" if we only held it was a heretical view, this would not have been declared. Shortly after schism too.

"And we, together with St. Maximos and the Romans of that time, as well as the Western Fathers, “do not make the Son the Cause of the Spirit”; while they, in their Conciliar Decree, proclaim the Son “in Greek, ‘Cause,’ and in Latin, ‘Principle'” of the Spirit." St Mark of Ephesus