Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile
Bryce James

@brycejofficial

25, Ex-Atheist,
Eastern Orthodox Christian,
Refute Everything.
EED Defender.

ID: 1827342873500495873

linkhttps://linktr.ee/brycejofficial calendar_today24-08-2024 13:51:21

243 Tweet

784 Followers

59 Following

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Hey! Any orthodox christians who think St Augustine taught filioque Give me a single father (St Photius 800 AD -> 1900 AD) That believed St Augustine taught it, if you cant, you concede you hold a liberal position 🗣

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My point is that all of the fathers that do speak about augustine, they say that he did not teach it. St Photius, Gregory Cyprus II, St Maxim the Greek, St Gregory Palamas, St Mark of Ephesus, St Gennadius And tons more Sounds like consensus of the fathers to me easily.

Uncle Ruckus ☦️ (@ruckusofantioch) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Same woman who said that: - the Dormition/ Assumption of the Blessed Mother wasn’t dogma in her materially heretical book. - we don’t have canon law -1642, 1672 were not authoritative - doctrine revolves around phronema, and not the apostolic deposit

Orthodox cross ☦️ (@orthodox_cross) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Hesychasm is not advaita vedanta or dzogchen. It is the Holy Spirit Himself praying within the human person deeply inside from the heart. He prays automatically with your heart and mind over time when you are in full participation in the liturgical-sacramental life of the Church.

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

youtube.com/live/6PnDSs46x… Formally debating Metaphysics Mike tonight at 8 PM CST on the biblical and logical account of the hypostatic union! Be there!!

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Tractate 92 (on John 15:26 Augustine) he believes (and most fathers and scholars agree) the the sending of the refers to economia, and in turn, denotes a different mode of procession than from the Father, if you follow the fathers logic, you make them affirm two principles.

Tractate 92 (on John 15:26 Augustine) he believes (and most fathers and scholars agree) the the sending of the refers to economia, and in turn, denotes a different mode of procession than from the Father, if you follow the fathers logic, you make them affirm two principles.
Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

He obviously doesn't believe that all economic relations entail eternal relations, See here. The way you interpret him causes all of the persons to cause each other in the Trinity. So that doesn't work either.

He obviously doesn't believe that all economic relations entail eternal relations, See here. 

The way you interpret him causes all of the persons to cause each other in the Trinity. So that doesn't work either.
Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Father Seraphim held augustine to a very high regard. So I would not say he's a modernist. I believe the way it was denoted at toledo was fine, and was the clarification on the operational order of the trinity. I believe the latin view began in St Photios time.

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

As you keep quoting things, you ignore my point. If temporal sending necessitates eternal relations, then the one that I sent you, entails that the Father and the Holy Spirit beget the son with St Augustine. Do you affirm this???

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If St Augustine had Mani in his heart for his theological assumptions about sin and atonement, then St Maximus the Confessor still has neonplatonism in his heart and we "should be careful accepting his teachings". Philosophy can be baptised by fathers btw.

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The east actually always held that they had a different god. There was a synod around 1150 that decreed "Anathema to the god of Muhammad" if we only held it was a heretical view, this would not have been declared. Shortly after schism too.

Bryce James (@brycejofficial) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"And we, together with St. Maximos and the Romans of that time, as well as the Western Fathers, “do not make the Son the Cause of the Spirit”; while they, in their Conciliar Decree, proclaim the Son “in Greek, ‘Cause,’ and in Latin, ‘Principle'” of the Spirit." St Mark of Ephesus

"And we, together with St. Maximos and the Romans of that time, as well as the Western Fathers, “do not make the Son the Cause of the Spirit”; while they, in their Conciliar Decree, proclaim the Son “in Greek, ‘Cause,’ and in Latin, ‘Principle'” of the Spirit." St Mark of Ephesus