BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile
BOONDOGGLE

@boondoggle322

Apolocalyptic liberatarian at the end of the world.

ID: 2009800341152559104

calendar_today10-01-2026 01:32:14

5,5K Tweet

211 Followers

138 Following

Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (@repdeliaramirez) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Trump’s Board of Peace is a money laundering scam. Billionaires are stealing $1.25B in taxpayer dollars to develop Gaza into their personal Riviera! The Board of Peace isn’t about peacekeeping or aid; it’s about profit. The future of Palestine must be led and directed by the

Trump’s Board of Peace is a money laundering scam. Billionaires are stealing $1.25B in taxpayer dollars to develop Gaza into their personal Riviera!

The Board of Peace isn’t about peacekeeping or aid; it’s about profit.

The future of Palestine must be led and directed by the
BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Why is Epstein, 911 dodging, lying Lutnick weighing in on mail in voting? He’s the secretary if commerce - it must be because these votes are for sale.

Jeremy Wilcox (@jwilcox79) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My whole adult life the narrative has been that conservatives are “patriots”, and liberals are the “American haters”. But liberals are desperately trying to save US democracy from a conservative movement hellbent on sacrificing it for one man’s ego. It’s exhausting.

BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) the Supreme Court’s analysis makes clear, in fact, that the status of the parents was not relevant to the legal status of a native born in the country. The court constructed common law and the English common law in reaching

Mark McEathron (@mark_mceathron) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's always wild to me how courts can rewrite law. When the framers of an amendment go through the ratification process, months and months of debate, and are clear about their intent and purpose of the proposed amendment, down to every single word used, then a later court comes

BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sauer's argument today before SCOTUS, which emphasized "domicile" has already been resolved. Domicile and political status (s.a. citizenship) are separate questions. The English common law - which was used to construct the 14th amendment in 19th century jurisprudence - is clear:

BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I wish the press would do its damn job and stop propagandizing the American people. It’s fairly frustrating to deprogram all these Twitter lawyers on X.

MJTruthUltra (@mjtruthultra) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🚨 Democrat Senator Harry Reid introduced legislation in 1993 to end Birthright Citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. "No sane country would do that — No sane country would give illegals citizenship" “If you break our laws by entering this country without

BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Here is Harry Reid (D-NV) in 1993 introducing a bill to end jus soli for children of illegal aliens. Whatever happened to this bill? Among other things, it underscores the fact that **congress** should be updating this law - SCOTUS should **not** be reinterpreting already

Lucien Wolfe (@lucienwolfe111) 's Twitter Profile Photo

♦️ A major disaster :: 🔺What happened today in America is practically a military coup. Yes, indeed. I'm not joking. More than 30 generals refused Trump's orders for a ground invasion of Iran. So far, 12 of them have been dismissed, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs

♦️ A major disaster ::

🔺What happened today in America is practically a military coup.

Yes, indeed.

I'm not joking.

More than 30 generals refused Trump's orders for a ground invasion of Iran. So far, 12 of them have been dismissed, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile Photo

When the common law was codified in colonial America, alloidial rights of the Crown persisted. The common law was clear: “There is no common law of the United States, in the sense of a national customary law, distinct from the common law of England as adopted by the several

BOONDOGGLE (@boondoggle322) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The fact is that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means anyone born in the US is a citizen with the exception of two specific categories of persons: children of ambassadors and children of enemies in foreign occupation of US lands. Parents accidentally in the US,