World Health Organization (WHO) Western Pacific Why would anyone want to "hook" children? That would be, very obviously, evil, illegal, and an utterly irrational and suicidal business strategy. What YOU are doing is pure propaganda. "They target teens" is the oldest prohibitionist meme in the books.

"Welcome to the looking-glass world of modern “public health”, countries with the lowest smoking rates are treated like pariahs while countries are praised for introducing counter-productive but ideologically approved policies. Intentions mean everything & outcomes mean nothing."

Australia: kansanterveysväki on kykenemätön (haluton) ymmärtämään miten markkinat toimivat, koska sen näkemykset nojaavat moralistiseen, lapselliseen, ideologiaan eivätkä faktoihin. Esimerkkejä Suomesta: nikotiini-, alkoholi-, huumepolitiikka... x.com/MadsMelbourne/…

Conclusion: No one has learned anything from the EU ban on snus. 20 million Europeans have died from smoking-related disease since the 1992 ban; millions could've been avoided. People will continue to use nicotine, and it's *weird* to try to deny them the safest way of using it.

The old page (from 2014-2015) was deleted because IARC/WHO rolled out the 5th edition ECAC in 2025. IARC still does not classify nicotine as a carcinogen—they're just not disclosing it to readers, all while lumping in vaping and pouches with cigarettes wherever they can.

Uusi kansanterveysväen keksimä kielto, uudet markkinat rikollisille.

🚨 The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) is calling for a “Less Harm, Less Tax” approach as the EU reviews its tobacco taxation rules. The Committee urges policymakers to adopt risk-proportionate taxation, recognizing the difference between combustible cigarettes and

EU Health Commissioner Oliver Varhelyi is spreading absurd disinformation about tobacco and nicotine risks. 23 experts write to explain the damage to EU citizens and the credibility of EU policymaking. CC: Ursula von der Leyen, Stéphane Séjourné, EU One Health clivebates.com/papers-and-let…

The EESC urges the EU to adopt a risk-based approach to tobacco taxation, promoting harm reduction and warning against overtaxing vapes. “Poorly designed taxes make proven harm-reduction products less accessible to the very people who need them.” daily-pouch.com/eesc-calls-ris…

Anti-nicotine activists know that increasing taxes on vapes and nicotine pouches will lead to black markets, unsafe contraband and more people returning to smoking = more deaths. Not only do they not care, they'll likely use that in their future campaigns. thefirebreak.org/p/taxing-consu…

2026 is the year in which the IMF does better health research than the WHO. imf.org/en/publication…

"Mutkun piti vähän yhtenäistää verotusta". Vitun idiootit, en paremmin sano. Te verotatte lähdevettä. Terveysperusteella.

EU:n antismoking-väki arvioimassa "menestystään": tuloksettoman hääräilyn mittaamista kansanterveysvaikutusten selvittämisen sijaan. Faktat sivuutetaan, koska ne eivät tue keinotekoista narratiivia. ethra.co/news/184-eu-co…

Sky-high European cigarette taxes drive thriving black market buff.ly/7502wmf Europe copying Australia's failed policy