Semi🌞Sol
@betruetoituk
Sun spot observer
ID: 1808834671264083969
04-07-2024 12:06:14
2,2K Tweet
265 Followers
164 Following
hodlonaut Giacomo Distributed-Authoritarian Plebslop Zucco Sorry to say but this sounds like a rationalization. "Hashrate" is two companies. And should your support be contingent on theirs you have two unacceptable implications: 1. There's nothing we can do against 51% attacks (should the change be undesirable) 2. The rules are
HOLDER OF LAST RESORT [NO2X] [HODL] Core V30 shows that a cabal of VCs, miners and small group of devs can ignore users/node runners and merge changes that damages Bitcoin as money. The objections were 4 against 1 and they merged anyway. What about that danger? If users don't define Bitcoin rules, the cabal will.
masanori_sha256 Luke Dashjr TimeEnergy Traveller Giacomo Distributed-Authoritarian Plebslop Zucco Raf-BIP110 node # go up hodlonaut Cato The Elder Holdonaut The diference between buying ammunition, loading the gun, and then blowing somebodies brains out, is one trivial step. In a court of law, that one trivial step can put you behind bars for life.
Trey Sellers ∞/21M Adam Simecka That's folksy, but empty. You're free to pretend that UTXO set bloat, gamified spam attacks, CSAM in op returns, use case creep, longer IBDs are nothing burgers, but then I have to conclude that you haven't really put in the work to understand what's been going on here. The good
zender ⚔️ URSF Completely fixing spam is impossible, that doesn't mean you should roll over and open the floodgates. The point isn't to make it legal compliant. The point is to keep awful stuff like CSAM off the blockchain before it's too late and kills adoption.
Coinjoined Chris ⚡ All true, except that the group trying to bend it to their will are the spammers, not the ones fighting the spam. They are the ones that have misunderstood the true cost of trying to abuse the rules. What you call "purists" is the network's immune system responding to an attack