When a monkey decides to join a theological discussion. Created, yet eternal... If uncreated, Jesus is uncreated! Goes for a statement never uttered by a group that associated itself with Islām, rather only ever argued by a Christian that knows no Arabic.

Besides the whole madhāhib issue, do you consider calling yourself "Salafi' to be a biʿah that is to be rebuked? If you do, then you have to condemn your own scholarship for using it, such as al-Āmidī. If you are joking, then you are mocking your religion. Which one is it?

"Be fine with each other," then goes and promotes a creed with kufr as its corollaries. Promotes one of the most disgusting doctrines to laymen and wants to dilute the conflict as a mere acceptable difference of opinion. You are not level-headed. You are just another criminal.

When you see an Ibn Taymiyyah fan saying "Ibn Taymiyyah's theory" or "Ibn Taymiyyah's philosophy" or "Ibn Taymiyyah's model" of so and so... Then, know that they are merely fanboys who have not understood the overarching goal of the man's lifelong project.

The discussion on causality being had on this platform is quite ironic. Some fellows are presenting arguments to negate their own causal efficacy, effectively nullifying the efficacy of their own arguments. So what is the point of presenting an argument if it has no effect?

Isn't it funny that this poor fellow is backtracking and falling into the Mu'tazilī's shoes who, for the same Christian arguments, abandoned the Sunnah? The Mu'tazilī considers you anthropomorphic and would disqualify you from challenging a Christian's beliefs as well.

So, he made the second car while sitting inside his first car?

Those who look down at ʿulamāʾ—who spent their lives mastering the Qurʾān & Sunnah—and look up to engineer/physician-turned-“scholar” types with shaky fundamentals are typically driven by a postcolonial inferiority complex.