Probably unavoidable due to demographic weights and past decisions, but the generation(s) that came of age during unprecedented wage stagnation and house price increases are also going to have to pay higher taxes through their (our) best earning years.

Addendum on this - look at the wage degrowth for those aged 30-39. If you came of age around the time of the GFC, you are in real terms earning less than 90% of what you would have done in 2008.

Civil war is inevitable.

Very good from Joxley though when it comes to the argument that people who graduated in the teeth of the financial crash, experienced negligible wage growth and are now facing the highest childcare costs in the OECD have it the worst, I’m biased news.uk.cityam.com/story/2254256/…

Don’t want to be a mad conspiracy theorist but is there a bigger story here?

This is very good from Robert.

Can't park there, mate!

The dynamic pricing thing does show the quickest way to make something an issue is to piss off middle-aged news editors.

New from me - on what the next stage of leadership contest might bring:

The duality of targeted ad-man

🎸🍺NEW BLOGPOST🍻🎤 The Fun Crunch is hitting. It's not just dynamic pricing, but rising prices across the board. Life's little sweeteners are becoming both harder to afford and less sustainable to provide. (FREE, Link next tweet)

Is it really better to have been chosen by Boris Johnson than by the Almighty?

With a turnover of about £1.3 billion, it's about a third bigger than the fishing industry.