Crazy error looks like a bullet going through Lincoln , not a scratch it is raised, not indented

Atlas The systems I described were built on autonomy — sub-IDs, compartmentalised identities under the user’s control, each disclosed only as much as the individual chose. Nothing was fed back to the government, no silent reporting, no data siphoned under the guise of safety. Access

The "AnchorChain" that CSW has been quietly developing is Simply put, it’s a system that fixes（anchor） AI memories on BSV chain and realizes "AI that cannot lie." Overlay network (like Layer 2) on BSV. A patent application is currently being filed.

There’s like 💯 bananas on just one of the trees. If I can just get a few clusters of these growing around the property I’ll never buy bananas again

Bitcoin Teddy And yet, he supports a system that shits all over it. The irony could power a small city. The man calls the white paper “poetry” while championing a bastardised version of it—stripped of scale, stripped of function, stripped of purpose. Imagine praising Shakespeare and then

He's back! Go support him. youtu.be/TxsjHwjL0u8?si…

The new age began with a password. They told you it was progress, that the world was finally becoming efficient, that identity could be made precise—mathematically perfect. But every perfection carries a shadow. The digital ID was not born from the spirit of freedom but from the

TheMarketSniper - MBA, CMT. #HVFmethod The banks "won" when btc forked with segregated witness. Full Stop.

BSV encourages everyone to "spam" the network. Go on try it, it'll only cost a fraction of a cent.

Mark Hunter There are roughly 30+ videos of Craig explaining Bitcoin on YouTube. Show me one where he’s clearly being fraudulent or doesn’t understand Bitcoin. That's all I am asking - Seems BTCer's cannot find one. Funny that...

BTC vs BSV is the scarcity versus abundance mindset made real. Which feels better? Which world do you wish to inhabit?

Digital ID should never be a government-controlled system. The entire point of a digital identity is to empower individuals — not to monitor, catalogue, or restrict them. It should exist on a peer-to-peer basis, controlled entirely by the person it represents. The individual, not

👀

So if Bitcoin was created and launched in 2009 and SegWit was invented in 2015, BTC segwit coins can’t be Bitcoin? grokipedia.com/page/Bitcoin#:…

has saylor ever said the word Craig Wright publicly?

😂 pool insurance must be getting pricey

history repeating itself? if you have a different opinion than them, they cut you out.

🎱 pay attention to the fact that the big players are going to just railroad & steal Craig's IP 🔮 that's the move begun to see a renaissance in people even in #BitCoin all claiming how Craig doesn't code. When we know in fact he has coded since the fucking 80s. He acknowledged

So what do you think is more private? One — sending $100 in 250 separate transactions, all of which are for different amounts, IP to IP to the other user, where they are in separate UTXOs and unrelated with 250 different addresses. Or — one single address that holds all of your