Pretty sure this means the entire field of nutritional epidemiology of chronic disease since 1980 isn't anything but one big pile of publication bias.

Mid-way through this book Chris van Tulleken 🏳️‍🌈 raises a critical aspect of UPF - how marketing influences food trends & social pressure to indulge. This has concerned me for some time. A reductionist focus on nutrients in science research misses the bigger picture of what is happening

Jon Wilkins 🇺🇦🌻 Keith Tse (謝嘉麒) (MCIL CL) Dr. Adele Hite Frank Mitloehner We Dietitians Dr Caroline Cupit Bret Scher, MD Alyshia Galvez NutrireCoLab Noakes Foundation JB and family @fatisourfriend Vincci Tsui, RD 徐詠芝

Three years ago today our review on ultra processed food & health outcomes was published. Pleased it was so well received has now been cited 400 times. Thanks to my mentors and fellow authors. Mark Lawrence Phillip Baker Marit Kolby @ppmachado_ mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/7…

A birthday message to Julian Assange. Today is Julian’s 52nd birthday. His 11th without his freedom. We haven’t forgotten you Julian and will keep fighting to make sure your next birthday is spent as a free man surrounded by your loved ones. #FreeAssangeNOW #freeassange

McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and other major brands are creating massive amounts of plastic waste. Their initiatives are not enough and they need to be held accountable for the plastics crisis. buff.ly/439OzcB

What is your evidence threshold (ET)*? Reply below set out as: profession/yrs doing *this*/your evidence threshold *ET: what would you need to convince you to change practice

Psychiatrists and psychologists push to get ADHD diagnosis on NDIS theage.com.au/politics/feder… while there is under-serving of many people there is an avalanche of people seeking this diagnosis now. Why? Need a deep dive. Meanwhile even more serious unmet need in other areas of MH

Julian’s extradition order is under appeal and a decision is coming soon. If extradited, he faces a max prison sentence of 175 years. Let’s make it clear to the US government that he has the full support of the Australian community. Exposing war crimes is not a crime

My five part prescription: 1. Treat the companies that make and sell Ultra-Processed Food like we treat tobacco companies. They shouldn’t fund health research or contribute to health policy. The scientists & medics they pay shouldn’t have a voice when it comes to health… 🧵

Local recurrences don’t happen very often, but they can happen. Even after a mastectomy. It’s why I made this video to show you what to look for 👇 It applies whether you’re flat, you’ve had an implant or a recon suing your own tissue …

When the #EATLancet diet was launched, it was criticized by many. John Ioannidis was one of them and dismissed the diet as "science fiction". thecounter.org/world-health-o… Did he have a point? Let's see... 🧵 1/7

Let's first clarify: the design of this diet had little to do with environmental constraints, its setup was based on nutritional theory coming from Harvard's Walter Willett. clear.ucdavis.edu/blog/eat-lance… 2/7

A recent publication from the PURE consortium confirms this, based on real-world data: adherence to the diet does not protect against mortality or cardiovascular disease. academic.oup.com/eurheartj/arti… 4/7

But not only does the diet not work, it also comes with "unintended consequences" related to nutrient adequacy (and, possibly, the brain). mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/2… 5/7

Yes, folks, Ioannidis was right. 7/7, end.

Pancreatic cancer has one of the lowest survival rates of any type. It is consistently underfunded, misdiagnosed, and considered a “death sentence”… even in healthy 31 year olds. If you’d like to learn more, please check out PanCAN at PanCan.org

I just read the Opinion Piece in the The New York Times about Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. and fitness culture among straight men 🚨I did not like it, and here’s why: First, the perspective seems from someone who hasn’t done her homework on who Huberman is, exemplified by her decision to quote a

Average time to retraction for chemistry papers: 1.7 years. Average peer-review time of 71 days -- but only 43 days for fraudulent papers. pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.10…

We Dietitians 👇🏽