The southernmost point of Canada is further south than the Oregon-California border.

Imagine if we put this type of effort into education or medicine or something instead of whatever this shit is

The Uk govt is willing to sacrifice the copyright of artists and writers to feed an American AI industry that is heading into a brick wall. Large Language Models (chatbots & Gen AI) are not a pathway to human level intelligence, according to the head of AI at Meta.

Sam Altman is losing the IP theft battle. The audience has turned against him. His Elizabeth Holmes day is coming.

Generative AI competes with the work it’s trained on, exhibit 72253

“If you’re you're saying that you don't even have to pay a license to that person to use their work to create the product that's destroying the market for their work—I just don't understand how that can be fair use.” — Judge Chhabria

An obvious lesson in what not to do. So thankful, now and forever, to be an LA Kings fan. #GoKingsGo

🚨 BREAKING: The U.S. Copyright Office SIDES WITH CONTENT CREATORS, concluding in its latest report that the fair use exception likely does not apply to commercial AI training. From the report's conclusion: "Various uses of copyrighted works in AI training are likely to be

Donald Trump’s termination of Register of Copyrights, Shira Perlmutter, is a brazen, unprecedented power grab with no legal basis. It's surely no coincidence he acted less than a day after she refused to rubber-stamp Elon Musk’s efforts to mine troves of copyrighted works to

"We don't have to steal content to compete with China". America is waking up to the fact that its culture industries are worth more than its over-hyped AI industries.

Read that slogan on the wall in this picture. It should have commas, not periods. It's saying something very different (perhaps more accurate?) with periods. Punctuation matters!

This is simply an admission your industry isn't legitimate. It's built entirely on theft and plagiarism. It deserves to die.

“If we cannot exploit people, our industry will fail” Wake up, it’s not innovation.

i move to nominate this guy for the nobel prize, because he tried to warn us 8 years ago, but we didn't listen

I looked deeply in the mathematical formulation of diffusion models (image & video generators) & they are inherently doing stochastic gradient based pixel blending nothing more. The explanation that follows below will be a bit technical so buckle up.

Congratulations! You've just finished your first completely AI generated feature film! All you have to do now is get distribution and an audience willing to pay for it, two things that are traditionally very easy to do. Welcome to filmmaking, champ, you're going places!

If you actually believed this then you'd be morally bankrupt for working at a company looking to make it happen. That leaves only a few actual reasons for saying something like this: 1) You believe you're a part of the few, specially chosen, wise people who should have this

People laugh at me when I say AI is all smoke and mirrors, but I’m right. The moment you stop seeing it as “the future” and, instead, the next pump and dump like NFTs and Bitcoin, this whole debate becomes so easy to see through.

Now that the promise of AGI has been taken off the table the reality of massive copyright theft conducted by AI companies ( “so we can build AGI”) has been exposed. Now is a good time to start litigation against AI companies for copyright theft - avoid the coming rush.