🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Happy Friday everyone! I just posted what I think is an important blog post on my website. It is a critique of meta-meta-analyses: meta-analyses of meta-analyses.

When Evidence Synthesis Obscures: A Critique of Meta-Meta-Analyses matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/blo… via Matthew B. Jané

I just received 3 coffees from Thom Marchbank on Buy Me a Coffee! buymeacoffee.com/matthewbjane/c…

Thank you Thom! I really appreciate the support!

An awesome post by Matthew B. Jané on the scourge of meta-meta-analyses. These things should be banned.

It’s more like <.05 = significant >.05 = redo calculations until <.05

Born in Connecticut and raised in a Boston suburb, Ian Seymour couldn’t have scripted it any better for his MLB debut. We chatted after he earned the extra-innings win at Fenway, a ballpark he’s come to since he was a kid. Rays on FanDuel Sports Network

This is awesome. I played on Ian’s little league team and I pitched against him in high school (I wasn’t able to strike him out unfortunately). He was always a stud. This is the only time I rooted against the Red Sox.

Update on Error Report #2: The impact of acoustic stimulation during sleep on memory and sleep architecture: A meta-analysis The article has been retracted by agreement with the journal editor and authors

“Meta-analysts HATE this one weird trick”

Sichu Lu([email protected]) TracingWoodgrains Mixed feelings. In practice he is right. The big problems are as follows: - people who conduct meta-analyses are often not meta-analysts so they haven’t a clue what they are doing or how to interpret anything. - I think there is a fundamental misalignment between what readers

“Shocking results”😱 and it’s just d=.05

The really annoying thing is I just started incorporating em dashes into my writing, but now it’s not even cool anymore.

Happy 4th!

It’s official. He’s back🇺🇸