Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile
Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic

@martin_adams

Divergent Thinker, Innovator & Educator
Launched: resume.fail
Author: @AtomicNoteTakin
Building @flowtelic
YouTube: youtube.com/@Martin_Adams

ID: 50427950

linkhttps://meda.io/#/portal/signup calendar_today24-06-2009 20:36:55

38,38K Tweet

4,4K Followers

2,2K Following

Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now we're getting to the core of the product, creating tests that can be sent out to participants to feed back on. Next up, adding sections for the test introduction, profile questions, test variations, and test validation.

Now we're getting to the core of the product, creating tests that can be sent out to participants to feed back on.

Next up, adding sections for the test introduction, profile questions, test variations, and test validation.
Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now we have an AI powered app! Generate intro texts based on the study type for participants. Next up, the questions we're going to ask the participant before they see the test.

Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Social media platforms should introduce an Openness Quotient (OQ) score, which is based on your past replies, and relates to how much you try to be right vs ask to learn. Then, people with a high OQ can spend their time actually discussing ideas with each other and those with a

Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

After building resume.fail with Cursor 1, and now using Cursor 2.0, I can say that it's so much faster and more accurate. Nice to see how things have progressed.

Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Interesting to see programming heading the same way as self driving cars. Over time you’ll just say the destination you want to get to and the AI will do the heavy lift. Reading some of the replies, it really does feel like the “AI can never drive a car” moment. It’ll only

Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You know you've gone too far when the Cursor chat bot starts breaking out the plain text formatting in the middle of the code it's telling you to use.

Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

All the negative comments on MCP servers saying they’re a waste of time. I don’t get it, using the Figma MCP server is really impressive, and I don’t really know how to use AI to translate designs to code that well otherwise. Is it because it’s basically just an API branded as

Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I use different AI's for specif things. Do you do the same? ChatGPT: For creative, outlining and reasoning tasks Grok: For fact checking, policy and topical questions Gemini: For deep research Cursor: For coding projects How about you, got any different or interesting ways

Chubby♨️ (@kimmonismus) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I have absolutely no problem with AI being used in daily workflows. However, a little more effort and seriousness would be necessary.

I have absolutely no problem with AI being used in daily workflows.

However, a little more effort and seriousness would be necessary.
Martin Adams | Building Flowtelic (@martin_adams) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ahh, a BBC just referred to a ‘computer program’ and used the spelling ‘programme’. Now, I’m all for the correct use of programme, but that one ain’t it.