🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

creating a duplicate statute version of the MC1215, and subsequent governments have been deceiving people into believing they have been removing articles from it ever since, when it was actually the statute version they were repealing/amending.

The constitutional document MC1215 is still as relevant today as it was on the 15 June 1215, when it was sealed by King John.

It may not be subversive of the rights and liberties of the subject. (The case of Nichols v. Nichols, 1576, stated "Prerogative is created for the benefit of the people and cannot be exercised to their prejudice".)

interferes with the liberties of the subject. The courts have jurisdiction therefore, to enquire into the existence of any prerogative, it being a maxim of the common law that the king ought to be under no man, but under God and the law, because the law makes the king. If any

prerogative is disputed, the courts must decide the question of whether or not it exists in the same way as they decide any other question of law. If a prerogative is clearly established, they must take the same judicial notice of it as they take of any other rule of law."

The Cambridge Law Journal, 1955, referring to (now Professor Sir, QC) William Wade’s The Basis of Legal Sovereignty, said that: “sovereign legislation depends for its authority on (what Salmond calls) an ‘ultimate legal principle’, ie: a political fact for which no purely

legal explanation can be given. If no statute can establish the rule that the courts obey (the UK) parliament, similarly no statute can alter or abolish that rule. It is above and beyond the reach of statute…because it is itself the source of the authority of statute.”

In other words, the relationship between parliament, sovereign legislation and the courts of law in the United Kingdom is unalterable.

(wealthy families holding positions of alleged authority and power) attempted to deceive the people (many in the day were illiterate), by producing Magna Carta 1297 (which was in statute form – government created legislation which government could then repeal) into thinking that

Magna Carta 1215 had been repealed. That lie is still the current government narrative. It was actually criminal (political subversion) to attempt to bring an agreement made between the people (represented by the barons in those feudal times) and the monarch into statute form.

Parliament can only repeal temporary statutes they 'create' - they cannot repeal our foundational constitutional laws - PERIOD Same thing they did with the coronation oath act/Bill of rights act 1688 A 🧵 here (& other 🧵's in pinned post) x.com/LepaDinis/stat…

Basic history - Estates: The 'Estates' (various hugely wealthy families with long blood lines) have been attempting to destroy Magna Carta 1215 since the moment it was sealed. In 1216 King John, who was very much of the same mindset as the 'Estates' ideology with his cruel

Parliament illegally created Magna Carta in Statute form and continued to repeal the statute version to deceive the people and usurp their sovereignty. We do NOT give our rights away to the (frankly useless) barons when we swear an Oath of allegiance to them. It is lawful

Earth is in its first ice age in 260 million years after cooling for 50 million years. Carbon dioxide drives every food chain & sustains oxygen on earth via plant photosynthesis. It doesn't drive climate & is in decline. Fake global warming is the problem. Earth needs to warm up.

Virginia Gerwat She's not the DIL at most the GDIL, but QE2 wasn't the monarch & the ginger whinger isn't the son of KFC 😂🐇 hole. x.com/LepaDinis/stat…

🌹𝓢𝓷𝓸𝔀𝓦𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮🌹 ✨𝒮𝓃ℴ𝓌𝓎✨ I loathe the lot of them, including QE2. Parasitic, treasonous fuckwits. x.com/LepaDinis/stat…

🌹𝓢𝓷𝓸𝔀𝓦𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓮🌹 ✨𝒮𝓃ℴ𝓌𝓎✨ Dazzling Doubter We don't have a 'government'. x.com/LepaDinis/stat…

OTD… Our beloved Magna Carta was officially signed in 1215. A treaty that is in perpetuity, as stated in Article 61 & 63, that these Lawless impostors in Parliament wannabe dictates, absolutely NEED the People to forget. …& Coincidentally, I share the same birthdate! 💜

Joan Anderson He isn't the 'king'. x.com/LepaDinis/stat…

Rupert Lowe MP You're part of the problem, but you know this. x.com/LepaDinis/stat…