Kartikay Agarwal (@kartikaynaramau) 's Twitter Profile
Kartikay Agarwal

@kartikaynaramau

ID: 1762717975679795200

calendar_today28-02-2024 05:55:01

19 Tweet

8 Takipçi

13 Takip Edilen

Kartikay Agarwal (@kartikaynaramau) 's Twitter Profile Photo

santosh kumar BPCL has not paid a single amount of money since 31.5.1988 neither to us nor the earlier leaseholder. We are unable to understand why your officers are misguiding PESO Agra PESO Nagpur that we are not owners. If we are not owners y letter to us for lease?

<a href="/kumarsantbpcl/">santosh kumar</a> BPCL has not paid a single amount of money since 31.5.1988 neither to us nor the earlier leaseholder. We are unable to understand why your officers are misguiding <a href="/pesoagra/">PESO Agra</a> <a href="/PesoNagpur/">PESO Nagpur</a> that we are not owners. If we are not owners y letter to us for lease?
Kartikay Agarwal (@kartikaynaramau) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We are here to clarify the facts before santosh kumar and we demand all the dues since 31.5.1988 to which we are entitled. Bharat Petroleum has also not removed it's fixtures till date from the said site. This is the working of a PSU. PMO India Narendra Modi Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas #MoPNG

We are here to clarify the facts before <a href="/kumarsantbpcl/">santosh kumar</a> and we demand all the dues since 31.5.1988 to which we are entitled. <a href="/BPCLimited/">Bharat Petroleum</a> has also not removed it's fixtures till date from the said site. This is the working of a PSU. <a href="/PMOIndia/">PMO India</a> <a href="/narendramodi/">Narendra Modi</a> <a href="/PetroleumMin/">Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas #MoPNG</a>
Kartikay Agarwal (@kartikaynaramau) 's Twitter Profile Photo

मंत्री जी Bharat Petroleum के उस मुनाफे में हम जैसे जमीन के पट्टाधारकों का लगभग 35 साल से किराया भी समायोजित है जिसका भुगतान आजतक नही किया गया है। आपसे आग्रह है कि हमारा 35 साल से कानपुर नारामऊ की साइट पर बकाया किराया दिलवाने में हस्तक्षेप करे। santosh kumar

Kartikay Agarwal (@kartikaynaramau) 's Twitter Profile Photo

PESO Nagpur on 22.2.24 PESO Agra was directed to issue fresh show cause notice to Bharat Petroleum and dealer. When the copy of the same was sought in RTI , the concerned officer acting smartly has replied with the same old show cause notice issued prior to writ 5288/2024.

<a href="/PesoNagpur/">PESO Nagpur</a> on 22.2.24 <a href="/pesoagra/">PESO Agra</a> was directed to issue fresh show cause notice to <a href="/BPCLimited/">Bharat Petroleum</a> and dealer. When the copy of the same was sought in RTI , the concerned officer acting smartly has replied with the same old show cause notice issued prior to writ 5288/2024.
Adv. Deepak Shukla (@kachehriwaale) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Kartikay Agarwal PESO Nagpur PESO Agra Bharat Petroleum बहुत ईमानदारी है भाई PESO Agra में। इतनी ईमानदारी है कि RTI में भी गलत कागज़ दिए जा रहे है। Piyush Goyal Office Piyush Goyal आपके मंत्रालय के अधिकारियों को जानकारी छुपाने में ज़्यादा आनंद मिल रहा है।

Harsh Gaur (@harshwg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Kartikay Agarwal PESO Nagpur Piyush Goyal Piyush Goyal Office PESO Agra Bharat Petroleum Don't understand why can't the law of the land be simply followed ?? 🙄 Why the law is not being adhered to ?? Who is benefitting by not following the law ?? Why NO action initiated against the culprits !

Vikas Dixit: Adv. Allahabad High Court (@cavikasdixit) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Harsh Gaur Kartikay Agarwal PESO Nagpur Piyush Goyal Piyush Goyal Office PESO Agra Bharat Petroleum While PESO argued in HC that the petitioner has no case on merits but still they are delaying the matter on their end for obviously the reasons best known to them. When they have argued the that there is no case in point 5 , they should come clean on this now. It is enough now.

<a href="/Harshwg/">Harsh Gaur</a> <a href="/Kartikaynaramau/">Kartikay Agarwal</a> <a href="/PesoNagpur/">PESO Nagpur</a> <a href="/PiyushGoyal/">Piyush Goyal</a> <a href="/PiyushGoyalOffc/">Piyush Goyal Office</a> <a href="/pesoagra/">PESO Agra</a> <a href="/BPCLimited/">Bharat Petroleum</a> While PESO argued in HC that the petitioner has no case on merits but still they are delaying the matter on their end for obviously the reasons best known to them. When they have argued the that there is no case in point 5 , they should come clean on this now. It is enough now.