James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profileg
James Todaro, MD

@JamesTodaroMD

partner @greymattercap. not financial advice.

ID:803788403179474945

calendar_today30-11-2016 02:31:03

6,8K Tweets

135,0K Followers

2,0K Following

STFX(@STFX_IO) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We are thrilled to announce the STFX x Vertex 🏔 integration!

🔥 All the Fees are now -75% (!) Lower
✅ Over 30 Assets
📈 Deeper Liquidity + Better Performance

The biggest integration in the history of STFX is now Live!

🧵⤵️

account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I recently joined the board for the American Society for AI.

Our goal is to bring the top pioneers in AI together in one place for our annual conference Dec 8-9.

If you are an entrepreneur, investor, developer or advancing AI in other ways check us out!

asfai.org

account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mainstream media, corrupt government officials and big pharma scientists are attempting to gaslight the nation by creating an illusion of scientific consensus in their harmful response to the pandemic—locking down the economy, shutting down small businesses, stay at home…

account_circle
Chief Nerd(@TheChiefNerd) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🧵 1. Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD - In addition to the $2.6M financial windfall for your charities, the debate w/ RFK Jr will allow you to clarify some of the inconsistencies in your authoritative pronouncements during the pandemic

Robert F. Kennedy Jr Joe Rogan

account_circle
The Vigilant Fox 🦊(@VigilantFox) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Here’s Peter Hotez in July 2022, spreading misinformation — telling the COVID-recovered that they need to get vaccinated and boosted to protect themselves from “SERIOUS” Omicron infection.

“Whether or not you’ve been infected, you still need to go through that full vaccination…

account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Step 1: Call the opposing opinion a conspiracy theory.

Step 2: We don’t debate conspiracy theorists.

You win and civilization advances in leaps and bounds!

account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The corrupt establishment stooges continually refuse to enter public debates.

This repeated approach ranges from politics (prior election cycles) to objective fields of science and medicine.

Instead they rely upon pedigree (“we are the experts”), censorship, and mass…

account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

New Zealand's lockdown tyrant PM Jacinda Ardern suddenly resigns ahead of a challenging election.

What happened to the mainstream media's pandemic heroine?

account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

2 years later...the adverse effects are piling up.

The science didn't change.

The vaccine's benefits for young people never outweighed the risks.

account_circle
Stakeholder Consultant(@echetus) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If you use Wikipedia, you've seen pop-ups like this. If you're like me, you may have donated as a result.

Wikipedia is an amazing website, and the appeals seem heartfelt. But I've now learnt the money isn't going where I thought...

If you use Wikipedia, you've seen pop-ups like this. If you're like me, you may have donated as a result. Wikipedia is an amazing website, and the appeals seem heartfelt. But I've now learnt the money isn't going where I thought...
account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Hey Elon Musk can you buy The Lancet and NEJM and release their files?

They are a veneer of prestige but with internal documents as ugly as twitter’s.

Would love to see the internal docs on and reasons behind rejected submissions from so many incredible scientists.

account_circle
James Todaro, MD(@JamesTodaroMD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Wikipedia in a nut shell

1. Actual research produces a controversial claim that goes against the Left’s agenda

2. MSM declares it incorrect based on anonymous sources/weak evidence

3. Wikipedia adds “controversies”section labeling claim a “conspiracy theory” w/ MSM references

Wikipedia in a nut shell 1. Actual research produces a controversial claim that goes against the Left’s agenda 2. MSM declares it incorrect based on anonymous sources/weak evidence 3. Wikipedia adds “controversies”section labeling claim a “conspiracy theory” w/ MSM references
account_circle