BMJ just posted this systematic evidence review of 63 studies. It found "a lack of evidence supporting any association of e-cigarette use with cardiovascular disease." That cuts out 36% of all smoking-related deaths. Seems like something people who smoke would want to know.

Easy to spot, most of World Health Organization (WHO)'s false information on X already has a community note under it.

Smoking among Oregon 18–24 yr olds fell 75.8% since 2007 📉 Vaping didn’t fuel smoking — it coincided with historic declines. But sure, let’s keep the prohibition playbook going while cashing tobacco checks. 🙄 👉 thr101.org/oregon #ORLeg #PublicHealth

Recently publication pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40829784/ exemplifies questionable NIH funded studies searching harms in #Vapes from extrapolating cell/mice studies to humans, exaggerating #Vape toxicity, misrepresenting "particulates", ignoring contrary evidence. I attach text for detail

Gentle reminder to American Heart Association Association: 1) We know that YOU know quitting smoking by vaping lowers risk of cardiovascular disease 30-40%, to a level that "did not differ from non-users" 2) AND we know you actively discourage people who smoke from quitting by

Jukka Kelovuori Phil MUSC Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science Loosely translated: People who can't quit smoking using FDA approved methods Do Not Matter. x.com/RushmoreExt23/…

World Health Organization (WHO) What safeguards do YOU have in place to ensure World Health Organization (WHO) messages contain no false information? Honest question. I served as a Senior Advisor to WHO for 3 years. I'm not a dim bulb. I am aware of NUMEROUS WHO tobacco control messages that were demonstrably false. Want examples?

Does Trump Intend to Keep His Promise to Save Vaping? President Trump promised to save vaping, but his FDA has so far done exactly the opposite -- denying PMTAs, seizing shipments, and demonizing vape shops. ow.ly/yyAe50WyORV

The World Health Organization (WHO) literally has no shame.

Parliament debates, workplace vaping risks & UKVIA warns of relapse risk Reviews: Zorva 4 Kit + Caliburn G4 Mini. Deals from £8.06! planetofthevapes.co.uk/potvnewsletter… #VapingNews #POTV #vaping

Holy CRAP! I love it!!!

Here's a pretty good breakdown and explanation of NJOY'S new lawsuit against the FDA over its stalling and 3 year delay in deciding the appeal over the denial of NJOY flavored products. 2firsts.com/news/njoy-sues…

What's even nastier than people who still smoke? That would be people who ostracize and belittle people who still smoke as a means to make them quit. It's 2025, and there are far more attractive options for those who smoke, but also for those who don't.

Today, continued suggestions of 'approved' smoking 'cessation' therapies facilitate more smoking. A person who smokes tries "relapses" an average of 30 times & blindly doesn't realize they face 93% failure rates. Quit 'tools' promote repeat customers & more smoking than

Will the FDA find vapes APPH or will they continue to conflate issues. thr101.org/post/study-fin…

"If Belize embraces harm reduction alongside sensible regulation, the country could accelerate its decline in smoking and position itself among the first in Latin America to reach smoke-free status." thr101.org/post/aligning-…

Nicotine is addictive, except when it's non addictive, it's proportional I suppose, making cigarettes safe. Note: There is no safe level of tobacco CONtrol. x.com/Wdekanter/stat…

🚭 Breaking the ‘Gateway’ Myth Academic-turned-consultant Arielle Selya set out to prove vaping leads youth to smoking, but the data said otherwise. Her research found no evidence to support the “gateway hypothesis." bit.ly/468Uvas

Media, Researchers Fuel More Vape Misperceptions Kiran Sidhu Filter | harm reduction journalism “They caution against drawing casual conclusions,” she continued, “but then strongly imply them anyway, without even acknowledging alternative explanation … ” Dr. Arielle Selya filtermag.org/media-research…

Interesting that they create a problem, that doesn't exist, to maintain relevance in spite of the HARM that their misinformation causes and will continue to cause.