Fully Noded - Dev (@fonta1n3) 's Twitter Profile
Fully Noded - Dev

@fonta1n3

pgp: 297D 3AA6 F231 4CD0 E023 CD9B 7C85 7452 1475 38F5 nostr: #npub1hpzcx0sxmy8alvv4gl8zrzj3x4ndv2g526nh85nhe6x5wevqk44s4cgyww

ID: 537056764

linkhttps://github.com/Fonta1n3 calendar_today26-03-2012 09:00:41

12,12K Tweet

1,1K Takipçi

1,1K Takip Edilen

Core Lightning ⚡️ (@core_ln) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Core Lightning v25.12 "Boltz's Seamless Upgrade Experience" is here! 🎉 New nodes open with BIP-39 12-word recovery phrases. Existing nodes maintain full backward compatibility. Major performance gains for large nodes and xpay improvements from user feedback. 📊⚡

Fully Noded - Dev (@fonta1n3) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩

Fully Noded - Dev (@fonta1n3) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Amazing that so many people (cough cough paid influencers) support contiguous arbitrary data on bitcoins forever blockchain.

Parker Lewis (@parkeralewis) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Stephan Livera Now answer my question, what is the incentive to relay unspendable outputs with large amounts of arbitrary data? Just actually explain what the economic incentive of that is (don't dodge it). I'm not asking whether you like spam or not, I'm asking about the economic incentive of

Fully Noded - Dev (@fonta1n3) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Polished the transaction creator today and started adding some basic “nodeless” functionality, ideal for newbs who just want an ultra simple single sig wallet. Seed generation, address derivation, transaction creation and signing all works 100% offline, put the device in

Murch (@murchandamus) 's Twitter Profile Photo

According to Dathon, one of these choices would get zero honest votes. 1. “Bitcoin is money, not data storage” 2. I support activation of “BIP-110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork” due to the author’s stated motivation.

Claire Ostrom (@ostrom72158) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If inscription UTXOs under 1k sats were removed from the UTXO set we would remove 38% of the memory being used by Bitcoin clients to store the UTXO set. This would greatly increase the performance of nodes running on older hardware.

If inscription UTXOs under 1k sats were removed from the UTXO set we would remove 38% of the memory being used by Bitcoin clients to store the UTXO set.  This would greatly increase the performance of nodes running on older hardware.
Fully Noded - Dev (@fonta1n3) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Who thought it was a good idea to allow a possible 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 scripts in a taproot script tree? Or is Luke wrong?