CA5: revs SJ in products liability action because fact issue existed on tolling of the 1-year LA prescription (limitations) period bit.ly/3Y9yBOP DRIAppellate

CA2: reversing dismissal of RICO claim; 1995 RICO amendment bars RICO claims only when the alleged fraud is in the actual purchase or sale of securities, not when securities are incidental to the fraud bit.ly/44BaOtJ DRIAppellate

CA2: forum selection clause in agreement was permissive; applying modified forum non conveniens test, suit in new York allowed bit.ly/43DAWmi DRIAppellate

CA5: LA lacks Art. III standing to continue litigation about Jefferson Parish School Board's policy during virtual school that punished two kids for having BB guns visible in virtual class bit.ly/3DqEcXA DRIAppellate

CA6: on different grounds than below, affs dismissal of claimed constitutional violations against Southfield MI's emergency medical personnel and the city for pronouncing a person as dead when actually alive bit.ly/3KftSpa DRIAppellate

CA5: break-up fee and expense reimbursement to stalking horse bidder were lawful under BK code because they provided benefit to estate and were made in reasonable exercise of business judgment bit.ly/3q4gQUr DRIAppellate

CA5: under TX law, affs no-duty-to-defend determination based on ins. policy's pollution exclusion and pleaded allegations but revs no-duty-to-indemnify determination b/c it was premature as that duty is determined by evidence developed bit.ly/3rPP5j4 DRIAppellate

CA2: attempted class action to hold creditor in contempt for violating bankruptcy court discharge orders; court could not hold creditor in contempt of orders entered by other courts bit.ly/3DGCK3y DRIAppellate

CA2: arbitrations of AEDA claims properly judged untimely under arbitration agreements; judge-made "piggybacking rule" only related to administrative exhaustion of EEOC claims; had no impact on contractual deadline to arbitrate bit.ly/3rWYkOr DRIAppellate

CA6: affs NLRB inj., including temp. reinstatement of fired union-organizing employees colloquially known as the Memphis Seven, against Starbucks; concurrence questions the test applied in NLRB cases instead of traditional std for injs. bit.ly/47qNcJO DRIAppellate

CA2: class decertified in Section 10(b) case against Goldman Sachs; Ds rebutted the Basic presumption; corrective disclosures did not match alleged misrepresentations, no presumption that misrepresentations affected stock price bit.ly/3qomxgp DRIAppellate

CA2: convertible note in investment transaction not unconscionable, DC reversed; lack of consideration for note a question of fact bit.ly/450IgKd DRIAppellate

CA2: limitation period for claim under sec. 1983 and Title IX for alleged sexual abuse of minor is the NY personal injury limitations period, not the extended one under NY Child Victims Act bit.ly/3YH55jN DRIAppellate

CA2: class action settlement vacated; free subscriptions given to class were coupons; DC should have evaluated reasonableness of atty fees award in context of overall fairness of settlement and in light of case being a coupon settlement bit.ly/3KLeIrL DRIAppellate

CA2: although P could not use RICO to recover for a personal injury, he could recover for injuries to his "business or property" that resulted from a personal injury, in this case lost earnings bit.ly/3P3SX98 DRIAppellate

CA2 DC had subject matter jurisdiction under Edge Act for claim against defendant bank because D was an "Edge bank" and claim arose out of transaction involving international or foreign banking bit.ly/47LKD5r DRIAppellate

CA2: Hazardous Materials Transportation Act preempts product liability claims related to container holding compressed air bit.ly/45r8EwU DRIAppellate

CA2: Investment Advisers Act of 1940 authorizes rescission of contract when performance of contract is illegal, not merely when performance under contract is illegal bit.ly/3RbOZwQ DRIAppellate

CA2: DC erred in concluding as a matter of law that loans with floating price conversion option (converting loans into stock) were not usurious bit.ly/3ZbGq78 DRIAppellate

CA6: maritime cargo insurance policy did not cover costs associated with shipping delays caused by loch closure by the Army Corp of Engineers except as already paid by insurer under Extra Expense Clause bit.ly/3J74wJ5 DRIAppellate