Zimbos are the embodiment of Uncle Ruckus Stephen in Django Unchained You dare not touch their whites! They loves their masters Masters is so good to uuuuus!

The white man is colonial: all about extraction They want your dances, your music, your culture Your icons and their quotable quotes And use them all to benefit whiteness As Baba Greg Tate put it: The White person wants EVERYTHING black except the BURDEN

This sentence was complete with its first four words. The rest is superfluous. You are not African.

UZ, Cambridge Doctorate & Full Professor vs Online UNISA & MSU Masters? Would be a bloodbath!! So you need someone to help the minister without exposing him: a Linda/Themba kind of brainless noisemaker does the trick. They will double-team & shout down the good Professor

SECT. 6 (7) "The Commission will endeavour to make decisions by consensus... at a meeting of the Commission at which a quorum is present, FAILING WHICH anything authorised or required to be done by the Commission SHALL BE DECIDED BY A MAJORITY OF MEMBERS at the meeting."

Absence of quorum doesnt affect legality of a meeting, but validity of decisions - wc s.9 saves Similarly, you dont cease to be a Commissioner due to absence of quorum - thus 9 allows functionality. NOW you know why there was no tribunal for her removal

Read slowly "NO DECISION OR ACT OF THE COMMISSION ... SHALL BE INVALID SOLELY because— (a)the Commission... consisted of LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS FOR WHICH PROVISION IS MADE in paragraphs 6 and 7" The text is unambiguous. Absence quorum is not dispositive of validity

You keep conflating a commissioner's power to act w the quorum requirements for a meeting. As per ur concession: a commissioner retains their authority & can act even absent a quorum, which dispenses of this claim that has NO basis in the ACT: "Lawful meeting requires quorum."

I have read it all & advise you to do the same. You unable to distinguish requirements for quorum w validity of meetings. When the Supreme Crt overturns a High Crt DECISION, it does not render the High Court HEARING unlawful Quorum isnt ontological but outcome-determinative

Parliament wrote into the Act the validity of meetings without a quorum precisely to cover the scenario under discussion The President knows it, which is why he did not establish a tribunal to investigate and cause her removal Take it up with the President And Parliament

Like I said: if you were right? There would be a tribunal investigating her as we speak. There is none And you are not a court of law. Thus: take it up with the President. And Parliament.

None alleged - because none was conducted. Leaving you pushing a political propaganda line when the actions of the administration show foreknowledge that their political line lacks legal merit.

As is Madam Jessie Fungayi Majome Still standing By your own concession: no misconduct alleged - thus no tribunal Leaving your posts brutum fulmen

That's right: brutum fulmen As I said before, despite your misconception to the contrary, you are not a court of law. You have no authority to void a report. Especially one which you concede was not the result of misconduct. Just wishful thinking on your part.

Because in Zimbabwe, politics is an arena of unbridled *lawlessness* As we are witnessing now Raw power above all else

Ok: I need just one.... ONE MORE WHITE PERSON who demands to be the face of black people's struggle? And I will support the amendment.

Learn the distinction between politico-legal advocacy & trial advocacy Practicing lawyers reserve their best claims for paid work in heads of argument - NOT online for free Non-practitioners & non-lawyers flood social media coz they ain't officers of the court Mabatsirika

I didn't say anything abt white men - you are obsessed with men (sadly) I said speak to the WOMEN so you learn how the rest of the world is not as *disempowered* as you are They make their own moves & bristle at the lack of agency that those from the bhundu like you celebrate

South Africa is the most unequal society in the WORLD. It has POCKETS of first-world amenities (for whites) in a SEA of third-world realities (for blacks) Whether you think it is first or third world speaks to whether you self-identify with whites or blacks

Let's remember one: Jonathan Nathaniel Mlevu Moyo is NOT a professor He has NEVER held the title of assistant professor, associate professor, or full professor at ANY university