🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Usury, making profit by simply lending two coins and doing nothing else to make three coins, was *always* strictly condemned by the Church prior to the Renaissance. It's simply making "fiat" money out of thin air backed by nothing. That practice is universal today.

Usury, for centuries condemned and considered evil, now considered as "normal," is one of the greatest tricks to destroy western civilization. Usury is a massive destructive force crushing civilization. Usury has played a major part in the current world we now experience.

The clear answer is that Christ has both human and divine natures, but He is one person. Not one person to the exclusion altogether of the other nature, as if Christ is somehow not a human.

The Catechism of the Council of Trent does not teach Baptism of Desire.

Lore Baronius, a humble man and later a Cardinal, was for decades a disciple of St. Philip Neri at his Roman Oratory in the 16th century. Philip asked him to write a Church history defending the Church. It became the great historic work (12 volumes) called the Annales Ecclesiastici.

Danny DeLuca ✿ ɠ𝐿ṩ ✿ 🌺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇩🇪🇫🇷🇸🇪🇭🇷🇭🇺 No, this certainly doesn't define the speculation of "Baptism of desire." The Latin text leaves no doubt. This claim has been refuted countless times over the years. We must include all that the Council defined on baptism and salvation, and there is no doubt it rejects BOD.

We who reject the Baptism of Desire for salvation speculation are against it because BOD is a rejection not only of Church dogma, but of Christ Himself. It's defined that there no salvation outside the Catholic Church, and defined none can be in the Church without water baptism.

The Last Gospel of the Mass declares no one can be born again, not by their own will or flesh (desire), not even by their blood (sanguinibus), but only by God (water John 3:5). Sanguinibus (bloods) is plural meaning blood shed, pouring out: Death. Neither BOD or BOB can save.

Velikovec 1. It never says the man goes to heaven without baptism; that is assumed and read into the text. 2. Receiving "grace and righteousness (justice)" was never used to describe dead non-Catholics. It always meant water baptism. 3. There's no Latin words for death in the passage.

Velikovec The entire treatise on baptism consistently contradicts BOD. The multiple writers of that large work on baptism were not ignorant. They clearly would have known that this one sentence contradicted everything else they wrote, if, in fact, they were teaching BOD. They weren't.

The underground cemeteries of Rome show the faith of the early Christians. They were fully rediscovered during the Pontificate of Gregory XIII. This timely discovery validated the Catholic faith. The following are from "The History of the Popes," volume #19, by Ludwig Von Pastor:

More 1500s anti-BOD proof: After the Council and Catechism of Trent, the Church's ancient dogma of Church membership for salvation (EENS), alone tied to water, Pope Gregory XIII then dealt with those, *who had not been admitted into the family of Christ (the Church) by baptism.*

Baptism of desire salvation propagandists falsely claim water baptism is not absolutely necessary for salvation--contradicting infallible dogma. Infallible dogma defined that only those sacramentally baptized are members of the Church, and can be saved. No water no salvation.

BOD by definition equals salvation outside the Church; because, none are in the Church without the sacrament of baptism. Only the Faithful--water baptized are incorporated into the Church, born again, buried with Christ in water baptism and receive His Character on their souls.

The 1585 English Protestant law of persecution against Catholics exceeded total depravity. Not only were Catholics murdered for having a Catholic priest in their homes, but Catholics in the surrounding areas were also guilty, because they supposedly "knew" that priest was there.

The Reformation--accomplished in great part because of the Catholic Renaissance-- devolved into complete evil in every way imaginable. Here's a short summary of just one example of the depravity and complete loss of morals of the Protestants during the English Reformation:

According to the infallible Lateran IV Council, only the Faithful (water baptized) are members of the Catholic Church and can be saved. St. Augustine asks, "Are you a catechumen or a member of the faithful?" A clear distinction. Gregory XIII knew timeless infallible tradition.

Fr James Mawdsley Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 This is incorrect. The Church never defined this. You are engaging in race worship. According to your false teaching, when the Faithful receive Holy Communion, they are somehow being "incorporated" into a particular race; additionally, they also falsely worship that race. Wrong.

Yes. This is the result. He equivocates a lot. But he does insert what he really believes when he says, "God is a Jew." It follows that, indeed, they do worship a race. We only worship God--not a race. There is too much wrong with he says all throughout to respond to each here.

Our goal should be Christian charity--salvation for potential converts. Catholics who continue to insist that there is salvation outside of the sacrament of baptism, that Christ Himself instituted, are unfortunately doing serious damage to those who could potentially convert.