The building of the Intl is not simply an "organizational" question, but a political one, that goes to the very heart of the program of socialist internationalism. The fight to build the Intl in every country is more than ever the cutting-edge of the fight for world socialism!

ICFI (1953) Supporters prepare shorter more readable pamphlet from ICFI Globalization book: Globalization: The Third Stage of Imperialism icfi1953.blogspot.com/p/globalizatio…

"The pre-war Social Democracy was a sprawling, slow-moving reformist organization which proceeded on the theory that it had unlimited time to advance to socialism at a snail’s pace in a completely normal evolutionary process, uninterrupted by wars and revolutions...

...The leadership in the main corresponded to the character of the party. Lawyers, doctors, teachers, preachers, writers, professors – people of this kind who lived their real lives in another world" - Cannon

Adriana ☭⁴ 🇵🇸 Free Bogdan! Revolutionary situations abound, but revolutionary leadership does not.

Philosophy is that which grasps its own era in thought.

"Last words are for fools who haven't said enough!" - Marx

Castroism and the Politics of Petty-Bourgeois Nationalism - World Socialist Web Site wsws.org/en/articles/19…

Thinking is, indeed, essentially the negation of that which is before us.

Not curiosity, not vanity, not the consideration of expediency, not duty and conscientiousness, but an unquenchable, unhappy thirst that brooks no compromise leads us to truth.

➡ ICFI (1953) : The Program for Global Socialist Transition: Proposal for the Program of a World Socialist Party icfi1953.blogspot.com/p/the-program-…

"Marxism sets out from the development of technique as the fundamental spring of progress, and constructs the communist program upon the dynamic of the productive forces."

The same pseudo-leftists that have alienated the workers continue to think that they still have sufficient influence to bully people into their failed positions. Sad.

"The left" are just deranged Democrats. If they are "socialists", they are reactionary state socialists. Their "Marxism" is a grotesque mockery of Marxism. The so-called "left" is not left-wing in the slightest.