🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Most no-code AI-site-creator products are garbage but will still be around in ten years just because of how sticky they are. It’s like making a CMS 15 years ago. Great business to be in if you don’t mind screwing your customers.

Here I was thinking I was being nice offering “up to 20k users” on Pistachio for a fixed price, rather than charging per user for giant orgs. Now I know DOGE considers that wasteful.

Successfully got through Microsoft App Compliance Certification with this banger of an architecture diagram.

“It’s hyper customized for exactly what I need” you mean it is a complete disaster that your coworkers will hate you for when you leave.

Any Canadian company that wants to boycott US vendors, I’ve got an awesome Norwegian security awareness product for you…

Listening to customers sucks because first they come with reasonable feedback, eg “can you make it so copy doesn’t include the dates” so you agree to make them happy. Then they say “also can you change your entire roadmap and your ethos around product development, ty”

My current AI prediction is that within the next 5 years, SaaS sales teams will start to pitch the fact that the product is built by actual human developers (not no-code AI slop) as a benefit.

Is there any no-code AI app builder platform that isn’t seeing explosive growth right now? Must be awkward for them.

One of the problems in the cybersecurity space is that most of the products are built for enterprise and become inaccessible to SMBs (both due to price and complexity), and then someone makes a product for SMBs and it is just the enterprise product but bad.

Everyone is saying it’s because pentesting is just a compliance checkbox, but I’d argue a lot of the times the findings are the same. They aren’t real security issues, so fixing them would mean spending resources to tick the “fixed” box.