The real problem in the hadith of 'Aisha is not Hisham, as reformists claim, but 'Urwa and how he was sacralised by the (pseudo) science of hadith. I'll explain this later in details.

٢٦٦٠ - قَالَ أَبِي بَلغنِي أَن أَنَس بْن مَالك قَالَ لِثَابِت مَا أشبه عَيْنَيْك بِعَين رَسُول اللَّه صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَمَا زَالَ يبكي حَتَّى عمشت عَيناهُ 2660 - My father said: It has reached me that Anas bin Malik said to Thabit, "How similar your eyes are to

After years of studying hadith science, I've come to the conclusion that isnad science is indeed a joke, isnads are essentially meaningless—an illusion. Here are a few reasons why: -Transformation of Reports: Interrupted (mursal/mawquf) reports are often transformed into marfu'

Anonymity is a fundamental pillar of freedom of expression, as long as it's not used to commit a crime. You can ignore me if you like, but I always strive to provide direct links to sources whenever I affirm something (which not many people do). You can fact-check everything I

Ironic that the complainant doesn't take what you say seriously but buys into a corpus of material riddled with narrations narrated by anonymous men.

Meanwhile ash'aris