My latest thoughts on a bridge of reason to God: youtu.be/TZXeaWEVjoY

Unfalsifiable does NOT imply unverifiable or untestable.

An unfalsifiable claim is more likely to be true (and verifiable) than a falsifiable one. Unfalsifiability claims include (i) theorems of logic and math, (ii) truths whose denials are self-defeating (e.g., something is true), and (iii) truths grounded in personal experience

Really enjoyed this. Thinking on the edge of reality... youtube.com/watch?v=9-nwOA…

I unpack 3 versions of the "unsatisfiable pair" objection—and show why none succeed. worldviewdesign.substack.com/p/how-to-slice…

It could be a coincidence that there is only one driver for every vehicle on the road, or there could be a deeper reason for it.

First-person awareness is fundamental. Shapes and motions in a "shared" universe emerged.

This would only show that base reality is not a simulation, which we already knew.

I finally made a private “Worldview Design Studio” for those interested in seeing (and helping inspire) my published works in progress. I’ll be posting early drafts and other creations in development there. If that’s something you’d enjoy, check it out: worldviewdesign.substack.com/p/worldview-de…

Well, why think the roots of belief in God are solely found in religion? Some of the main reasons *offered* appeal to empirical evidence or analytic philosophy. Would these reasons not be rediscovered?

Today I wonder if this is classic projection. Is it not the typical THEIST (on the street) who takes God's normative aspects or good nature as given? E.g., Even the post below entails that God's authority is *ungrounded* (assuming grounding is asymmetric).

For those who think morality is grounded in God, are we talking strong or weak emergence?

worldviewdesign.substack.com/p/how-i-became…