The 2019 Wikipedia article comparing Israel to Nazi Germany is highly disturbing. A more apt comparison is a 2025 article on similarities between Hamas and Nazi Germany. Why are we not surprised that an editor nominated the latter for deletion but not the former?

Wikipedia's biased articles avoid acknowledging Jerusalem as Israel's capital. After I noted that NataliePortman's article omitted her birthplace as Jerusalem, Israel, it was corrected; but now, as Dr. Shlomit Aharoni Lir pointed out Jerusalem is listed alone again, as if unrelated to Israel.

The murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska by a homeless man in Charlotte is only now making headlines, as the gruesome case was suppressed by media obsessed with woke narratives. Act surprised: the Wikipedia article on her death faces deletion for "lacking notability."

Tricky Wiki accurately describes Wikipedia's editors attempts to delete the page about the murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte. Wikipedia's bias, once overlooked, is now recognized by mainstream media. New York Post, September 10, 2025.

You don’t hate Wikipedia enough.

Iryna Zarutska's Wikipedia article survived deletion despite some editors voting for removal. Thanks to all who raised awareness. Wikipedia's lack of good faith in its editors is evident with full protection, allowing only administrators to edit.

Research consistently shows anti-conservative bias on Wikipedia, with studies indicating that right-leaning figures are excessively framed in negative terms. The late Charlie Kirk’s page exemplifies this trend, serving as a reminder that such bias can carry serious consequences.

Russian, Arabic, Romanian, and French Wikipedia refer to Iryna Zarutska's murder, while English Wikipedia calls it a killing. Why?

Can anyone name a notable offline encyclopedia that mentions a murderer's skin tone? What's next, mentioning the skin tones of artists, musicians, or politicians?

The Wikipedia article on Erika Kirk is nominated for deletion and only administrators can edit it. "Shock" 😲

Some Wikipedians claim on a talk page that claims linking the pin worn by @Artists4Ceasefire to the Ramallah lynching, where Vadim Nurzhitz and Yossi Avrahami were brutally killed by a mob, are conspiratorial. What do you think? Do you find resemblance?

Pirate Wires' article, How Wikipedia’s Pro-Hamas Editors Hijacked the Israel-Palestine Narrative, named 40 pro-Hamas editors. Revenge took time, but Pirate Wires' credibility is now questioned on Wikipedia, with notorious editors from the Gang of 40 joining the discussion.🙄

Genocide requires intent. Hamas initiated the ongoing war, murdering, raping, and kidnapping civilians, prolonging conflict without surrendering, sacrificing its people. Yet foreign forces controlling Wikipedia labeled the situation "genocide," deleting opposing opinions.

Shana Tova 5786! Happy New Year! Wishing all a year of reclaiming public human knowledge from distortion and manipulation. A year to help Wikipedia restore balance and neutrality.

The difference between informing and brainwashing: 📖 Britannica introduces Israel by geography and borders. 🌐 Wikipedia opens with “occupies Palestinian territories.” Wikipedia has become a propaganda tool for pro-Hamas editors to manipulate public opinion.

Encyclopedia or Political Weapon? Wikipedia's biased article on Palestine presents disputed political claims as fact. It falsely declares it a fully recognized country, ignoring its undefined borders, limited sovereignty, and internal divisions between Gaza and the West Bank.

To present the “Gaza Genocide” as fact, Wikipedia silenced numerous scholarly opinions to the contrary. These include Duclert, Buser, Michlic, Spencer, Rosensaft, Flasch, Boot, and many others. This isn't knowledge; it's propaganda.

I am nailing Nine Theses to the door of Wikipedia. This has been my project for the last nine months. There has never been a thoroughgoing Wikipedia reform proposal—this is the first. If it doesn't work, we need to organize an alternative. 🧵

Wikimedia takes pride in advancing "knowledge" transparently, but its talk pages are manipulated. For instance, editor Abo Yemen (on Quatar's parole?) deleted a request to redefine Zionism as an indigenous liberation movement, stating "We can live without this in our archives."