Lightning Service Providers: upgrade from “trust me bro” to “user holds keys, signer enforces rules.” Customers will notice.

Role-based approvals mean the intern cannot fat-finger a ten million-sat close. Guardrails matter inside the org too.

Bigger channel caps unlock bigger revenue, but only if you trust your security. VLS gives the green light to grow.

Exchanges: offer instant Lightning withdrawals without adding assets to your balance sheet. VLS keeps you non-custodial.

If your roadmap includes "build secure signer" consider deleting that task and `git clone` VLS instead. Ship features, leave the security to us.

Security used to be a blocker. With VLS it is a differentiator you can brag about in the pitch deck, on social media, on your website, or just scream it from the rooftops no judgement.

"Non-custodial" Lightning wallet is cool. But not if it achieves that by blindly signing whatever the node asks for. That’s only "non-custodial" in theory, not in practice. We don’t make the rules.

Lightning adoption plateaus if people fear hot wallet meltdowns. Validated signing restarts momentum. It’s kinda a big deal.

Regulatory playbook: - stay out of custody - log everything - secure user funds VLS helps check each box. So what are you waiting for?

Layered defense: - secure hardware - policy checks - on-chain monitoring VLS glues the layers together.

Every transaction the node proposes must pass a protocol-correctness exam. VLS wrote the exam and grades on an unforgiving curve. No bell curve. Not on our watch.

Daily reminder: it’s all fun and games until you lose all your Lightning funds.

The fastest route to non-custodial mobile payments: - hosted node for uptime - VLS for signatures - user retains the keys Speed plus sovereignty. 🚀🛡️

Spending limits per key, destination allowlists, and on-chain sanity checks >> let’s cross our fingers and hope nobody steals our funds. Every. Day. Of. The. Week.