Feels weird to anthopomorphize AI chatbots in this job market. We should dehumanize our AI tools as much as possible

I keep seeing takes like this and I basically agree. if you want volatility go trade publicly traded quantum sh*tters. but it also conveys a deeper truth. crypto is boring because so many of the open questions have been answered. will stablecoins be allowed? yes. will we be

Gambling on mention markets is a tremendous waste of free will. Brian might have saved some future degenerate gamblers by doing this

A hill I will die on: Fiat has corrupted markets to such a degree that everything must be looked at as a financial investment, housing being the worst example. Real estate is a consumable good that provides utility; shelter. And it should be priced accordingly. You can

October’s sell-off wasn’t the end of the cycle—it may have been the reset it needed. Excess leverage is flushed, fundamentals remain intact, and institutional players are quietly rotating back in. Smart money is clustering around EVM chains, RWAs, and yield protocols—pointing to

Best take so far on wash-trading on Polymarket. The incentive for traders to create fake volume (airdrop) is much more plausible than Polymarket inflating a vanity metric

This is a kick-the-can-down-the-road solution, and we've seen it before in Japan, and it was CRAZY. In the 80s real estate prices in Tokyo were high, so they started offering 50-year mortgages to make things "more affordable..." if you stretch the loan, the monthly payment looks

Checking in on the NFL subreddit Reddit Lies

Spotify's post-layoffs slopcoded UI tweaking

to understand what is fundamentally broken with the US home ownership model, you can learn a lot by studying other competing systems in the world- lets look at China china has a unique welfare system called Hukou. it essentially pins you to where you were born, and your social

I would ask Amanda how many shareholders she’s aware of that accrue direct value transparently and programmatically from automated systems that aren’t subject to any human control… But we all already know what the answer is: zero.

If anyone left on earth is wondering what we meant by hostile sec Amanda was genslers right hand No law degree, no understanding of the tech, just seething politicized hate for DeFi Obv our lawyers don’t think uni is a security, before or after unification

Before pivoting to data science, I wanted to be a physicist. Physicists were rockstars from the dawn of quantum mechanics until the end of the atomic era. Now there is little incentive to pursue being a physicist. Several in my physics undergrad cohort opted to go to the

Geo Guessr but for engagement bait accounts

Mike Green is writing some amazing stuff at the moment. It's not in the delta, it's in the level and the cost structure. Read this and you will understand Angrynomics on a new level: yesigiveafig.com/p/part-1-my-li…

x.com/i/article/1993…

People love to cite traditional tech incentives as evidence that crypto incentives work. “Look at Uber. Many early startups subsidize demand or give out perks to growth hack.” People did not take thousands of rides a month to “farm Uber.” They liked the product Uber offered.

Spotify Wrapped is just a dashboard of meaningless data points now. The joy is gone

"hey man I know you're worried the trucking company might lay you off soon and you're behind on the mortgage, but Kalshi is offering 3 to 1 on 46,000+ trucker layoffs in Q1 so you might want to hedge that risk out"

My lil take is that while you can use the permissionless nature of crypto to build ponzis, you can also use it to build stuff such as global payment streaming or subscriptions that get paid with yield Things like that would require infinite licenses in tradfi, but in crypto i