🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

The need for genuine enquiries (without pre-determined outcomes). Like good clinical trials. Similar requirements and risks.

Another battle won in the war against unnecessary secrecy in industry-sponsored clinical research. The public has a right to know details, and to ask informed questions. The Health Research Authority Jay Bhattacharya open.substack.com/pub/hartuk/p/a…

💉What possible ethical justification could Moderna have provided for testing its new mRNA covid booster in low-risk healthy children? 🔎The good news is we may find out soon, with a recent Tribunal putting public interest above Big Pharma Secrecy 👇 1/2

Good question

👇👇👇

It’s astonishing that the UK, a country which historically has viewed itself as a bulwark of democratic ideals, would see fit to tie itself to this failed organisation with so many question marks over its role and that of its Assistant DG in the cover up of the lab leak theory

Let’s be honest. If young people tell us they are struggling so much with unfettered internet and social media access shouldn’t we be talking about more robust solutions than digital curfews? Like restricted smartphones until the end of GCSEs?💡 theguardian.com/technology/202…

"A man who pleaded guilty to paying for sex with a child prostitute in Telford in 2013 received a lighter sentence, as have many members of grooming gangs convicted of child sexual exploitation."

‼️

UK signs pandemic agreement with 'unaccountable bureaucrats' at WHO Speaking to the The Telegraph, UsForThem's co-founder Molly Kingsley warns that the WHO pandemic agreement is unlikely to be subject to "meaningful public or parliamentary scrutiny or debate" before ratification 1/3

3/3 Link to 'Starmer signs treaty giving WHO power to recommend lockdowns: Critics fear global agreement will give unelected health officials influence over UK policy' by Tony Diver telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/…

Your regular reminder that: (a) WHO pandemic plan (2019) advised ‘no obvious rationale’ for isolation of exposed individuals; isolation of sick people only ‘could’ reduce transmission; & (b) there has been no attempt to evaluate the utility of this cripplingly costly measure.

Meantime, here in the UK, we carry on blindly as before. See no evil, hear no evil.