It’s funny it’s swung this way, but people who spam impact metrics in arguments for reasoning why a player is good / bad are just as reductive as someone using basic PRA for evals. The metrics are good, but you should be able to explain why the player grades out good/bad

There’s a double standard when it comes to players “foul baiting”

Mac jones threatens to play football

Jake moody

80 got butter fingers

Cam Miller if he had Victor Wembanyama at WR

Porzingis

Who do i keep for fantasy next szn

Wit 2 jewish teammates

Here’s an idea. What if none of these teams are overrated and we’re just really bad at explaining why “surprise” teams advance and are actually good in an era defined more by parity than which team has the best player.

Sure

Useless

#TravisKelceEffect

231

Comrade Wemby mogs Chetanyahu

“learn to code” in the big two five

“Act III: Colorado”

dont care #SheHadVaginalScars.

Raiduh

Dis nigga bruh