If you feel like you need threats and stress to be productive, fine. (Life will throw some at you naturally anyway.) But purposefully introducing threats and stress to others for the sake of your own worldly success (direct or indirect) feels too manipulative to me.

Probably great for introductory type material. There are still some topics that LLMs are not so knowledgeable about beyond the basics, and cannot produce examples that require creativity beyond language. A great example is music theory. Hallucinating is also a big weakness.

I thought the premise was fun, but it unfortunately squandered its opportunity to actually say anything interesting... all potential themes were left unexplored, all inner conflicts were easily solved without effort.

Sounds great, and just the sort of thing I'd want for narrating an audiobook with a full cast. Unfortunately probably still too expensive for that. 😢

Wow... did not realize safety pins were so ancient 😄

Since LotR's success, many fantasy authors have enjoyed excessive world-building, but extensiveness alone does not guarantee reader interest.

Also notice the beautiful lack of a bean-shaped mouth

Same is true for most higher education subjects, which are forgotten in adulthood for lack of usefulness, but are mindlessly taught anyway

I like em dashes, and I hate that some people now take them as evidence of text being AI generated.

Problem is there's not much one can do about it, beyond social encouragement. It's like wondering how to make vegetables compete with sugar.

Similar: "Grrr, why do you always think you're right about everything?!" 🤔