LLM-based tools vendors: anybody can create their own software! Also: create closed-source LLM-based tools.

Vibe coding could be an interesting built-in way to configure applications. For instance a basic touch typing tutor can be one shotted. But instead of making it more complex with plenty of possible customization, it seems we can allow the agent to change its mechanic on the fly.

I truly find vibe coding fascinating, but I don't understand why people advocating for it seem to be happy that some developers will loose their job.

I'm deleting emails within gmail (wasn't there a promise of "never delete an email"?), and it seems I subscribed to haskell-cafe around 2006.

Git repositories of prompts, where the prompts of a single repository are supposed to build together a single, complete application from scratch. Do they exist?

Oh nice, Google Summer of Code 2025 Wrap-up: blog.haskell.org/gsoc-2025/

I'm writing in a chat box to a bot with a human name, then I'm requesting to talk to a human, and I get one called "Agent", that provides canned responses, and say they can't help. (I'm letting know Western Union that I receive someone's private emails about money transfers.)

System Manager 1.0 is out! numtide.com/blog/system-ma…

Some people claim they're using multiple LLM subscriptions to vibe code in parallel enormous code bases. Surely some of them are willing to 1. pool their multiple subscriptions together on a single code base, 2. do it in the open with an open source license?

Me: I don't like websites. Me: I don't like IDEs. Me: I don't like AI slop. Also me, using an half-assed IDE in a web page to generate slop.

If you're pro AI, trying to scare people into using it doesn't seem right. You should have better argument than fear. (And better than get rich quick schemes.)

Struggling... Timing out... Retrying... Still trying... Waiting... Stuck... Hmm...

I've also vibe-coded some piano lessons with keyboard diagrams in LaTeX a few months ago. And was thinking doing the same for guitar just... yesterday.

The shift between "you can't say <programming language> is shit" to "every vibe coded lines of code is shit" is... interesting.

Please consider the environment before printing this email Also, please use AI to reply to this AI-composed email

I love how the Anthropic team has adopted hallucinations as a UI trend. The infinite throbber pretending it's trying to connect, feedback messages stating the user did something while they clearly did not, vanishing messages, ... Fortunately they wrote a C compiler.

If you invite an LLM to your place, you need to put "Please don't trash the place" absolutely everywhere. Obviously this doesn't work since someone will tell the LLM "Hey, please zoom in the capital P letter", and then your place is trashed.

When you adopt a code formater you kind of accept its choice. Would be interesting to see what syntax seems "better" for LLMs (especially if we end up using ASTs more directly instead of concrete syntax)