🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

This week -- join us as John Leubsdorf from Rutgers Law ⚖️ takes on "Evidentiary Fringes," evidentiary doctrines left out of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Proposals for the 2019 Evidence Summer Workshop (to be held at Vanderbilt on May 23-24) are due today! Don't miss out!

This week -- Adele Quigley-McBride from Iowa State University discusses how "fillers" might help neutralize the biasing effect that contextual information has on forensic comparisons.

This week, Binyamin Blum(Binyamin Blum) from @UCHastingsLaw kicks off our fall season with an episode discussing the roots of forensic ballistic analysis in Egypt under British colonial rule.

This week, Emily Murphy from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law discusses whether technologies for detecting brain activity can be used for verifying memory. excitedutterancepodcast.com/listen/2019/10…

This week on Excited Utterance: Larry Rosenthal from Chapman University challenges the idea of using prophylactic rules to prevent the admission of potentially unreliable eyewitness identification evidence. excitedutterancepodcast.com/listen/2019/11…

This week, we begin our Spring 2020 season, featuring Jay Kadane from Carnegie Mellon University @CMU_Stats, who asks whether how we present (or cross-examine) fingerprint evidence makes any difference to jury decisionmaking.

For professors looking for a scholarly outlet during the COVID-19 outbreak, check out our new weekly teleconference, “The Unavailability Workshop.” First one is Thursday 3/19 at 2 CDT, and will feature Jeffrey Bellin from William & Mary . More details at unavailabilityworkshop.com.

Be sure to catch this week's episode with Yehonatan Givati from Hebrew University, who asks: Do people really think that it is "[b]etter that ten [or even one] guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer?"

The Fall 2020 season of Excited Utterance kicks off this week with Edith Beerdsen from NYU Law, who discusses her forthcoming article in Cornell Law Review on how to improve science in the courtroom in light of the replication crisis.

Excited Utterance returns for the Spring 2021 season with a special 100th anniversary episode in which Ed Cheng and Alex Nunn look back on 99 episodes of Excited Utterance. excitedutterance.com/listen/2021/1/…

Excited Utterance returns for the fall semester today with Alex Nunn interviewing Maneka Sinha from Maryland Carey Law about the problem of junk science at sentencing. Make sure to check out our list of coming attractions this fall at excitedutterance.com.

The podcast returns this week for the spring semester with George Bach from UNM School of Law, who discusses the use of lay identification witnesses in the interpretation of surveillance video. excitedutterance.com/listen

Be sure not to miss this week's episode, which features Fred Schauer from UVA Law School talking about his soon-to-be released book, The Proof, from Harvard University Press. excitedutterance.com/listen

A friendly reminder that proposals for the 2022 Evidence Summer Workshop, to be held at Vanderbilt on May 5-6, are due tomorrow, March 15. For more information or to submit a proposal, see evidenceworkshop.com.

This week be sure to catch our new episode with Jinee Lokaneeta from Drew University as she discusses her book The Truth Machines from University of Michigan Press on the Indian legal system's curious modern turn toward dubious "truth machines" like polygraphs and narcoanalysis.

I had a wonderful time chatting with @BandesSusan about the lasting lessons of COVID-era virtual trials. Her insight is incredible. Give the episode a listen!

Be sure not to miss this week's podcast with @BandesSusan, who talks to Alex Nunn about virtual trials. excitedutterance.com/listen/2022/10…

This week, Duke Law professor Joseph Blocher discusses his paper, Originalism and Historical Fact-finding with Brandon Garrett. We unpack the legislative and adjudicative fact distinction, and ask how courts should prove facts relevant to constitutional interpretation.

This week, catch @erin_r_collins from Richmond Law discuss "Evidence Rules for Decarceration." In an Excited Utterance first, the episode was recorded live at a UConn School of Law symposium hosted by the Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal and @JuliaSimonKerr.