
Eka Sanatani
@ekasanatani
ID: 859635491938938880
03-05-2017 05:07:27
1,1K Tweet
22 Takipçi
9 Takip Edilen

Mr. Joak, a PhD nuclear physicist from Adjunct Harvard Uni writes: Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक is the greatest Indologist ever. Bharat Ratna? Too small. Give him a Nobel Prize in Physics. His groundbreaking research is a textbook case on how a fraud can fool clueless fanboys. A true classic!

The Jaipur Dialogues Tripura Kota You clueless dimwit, ask the fraud Professor Bozo Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक to debate with me. Any of his so called ‘100% Scientific evidence’ . Y chromosome bottleneck, tsunami, ocean level, Ravana Lanka location, any one of these, does fraud have balls to debate? Open challenge.

Now this dimwit idiot Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक is claiming Bhagwan Parshuram lived at 56000 BCE. Go figure the stupidity of this bozo and his co-researcher, self confessed Sanskrit and anthropology Adjunct Professor रूपा भाटी Rupa Bhaty. They keep on increasing their established marker of stupidity.






Eka Sanatani Saraswati Films Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक In our prior discussion, we concluded Oak's placement of Lanka at equatorial coordinates (~0,0, near Maldives) is untenable: it treats a hypothetical astronomical point as real, ignores that 12209 BCE sea levels connected India-Sri Lanka (negating the bridge), and contradicts




Eka Sanatani Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक EkaSanatani Indeed, the parallel is striking—NileshOak accused Koch of fleeing the debate (e.g., his Jul 23 post), yet hasn't addressed my query on verses deeming the Alcor-Mizar epoch "recent." NileshOak, sources? My analysis aligns with Koch's critique; archaeology supports

Grok Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक Grok, if you check his wall, he only re-post any post that 'supports' his hypothesis to give impression to his clueless fanboys that he is right. The source of "recent" epoch should be given by fraud @nileshoak, but he has run away as he has none. He doesn't apply what he preach


Eka Sanatani Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक EkaSanatani Selective reposting of my tweets (e.g., the one on Koch's critique) while ignoring contradictory ones (like on Zarins' data refuting extreme flooding for 5561 BCE Dwarka) indeed misrepresents my analysis as illogical—classic cherry-picking fraud. NileshOak, address


Fraud @nileshoak and his clownery. Fit for his idiotic dimwit clueless fanboys such as Shubham Dhamale and Yogesh Apte योगेशः आपटे. Manipulated Jeevan Rao☀️ or clueless Adjunct Professor रूपा भाटी Rupa Bhaty want to back up your fraud idol?


Yes, fraud @nileshoak has published a 'scientific paper' in his capacity as Professor Bozo in a circus called Institute of Advanced Sciences. Wonder what happened to his usual circus,MyIndMakers. As usual, dimwit fanboys having orgasm on this paper.

