
CEDAR
@cedaruk
We're no longer posting from this account. For updates on diet and physical activity research, please follow @MRC_Epid
ID: 330212103
https://www.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/cedar/ 06-07-2011 08:34:59
4,4K Tweet
4,4K Takipçi
1,1K Takip Edilen

Are plant-based meat alternatives a nutritionally sound alternative to meat? 🥩🍔🫘 Dr Daniel Borch Ibsen, Research Associate, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge University examines the evidence on #WorldPulsesDay2023 Read his thoughts here: bit.ly/3JYEYj8





The ActivePregnancyFoundation #COVID19 lockdown survey of 722 #pregnant & #postnatal women found low levels of physical activity compared to pre-lockdown. The report by Dr Kathryn Hesketh & colleagues found reduced opportunities and ability to be active. activepregnancyfoundation.org/post/overlooke… 🧵(1/n)





Join us this Friday, 10 November, 2pm GMT to discuss with PhD Georgina Dowsett "Are anti-obesity drugs really the answer to the problem of our food system?" Cambridge Metabolism Cambridge University Email [email protected] for the Zoom link


There's lots of talk about 'systems thinking' in public health research, but it's not always clear what it might mean for doing things differently. In this paper Miriam discusses how systems thinking could help generate novel research questions. gh-bmj-com.ezp.lib.cam.ac.uk/content/8/Supp…



Read the paper 'Estimated impact of the UK soft drinks industry levy on childhood hospital admissions for carious tooth extractions: interrupted time series analysis' by Dr Nina Rogers and colleagues in BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph… (2/2)


Heard of participatory systems mapping and not sure where to start? A new guidance and framework developed by researchers Improving Health & Cambridge University will help you select the method that’s right for you and think about how to design your project doi.org/10.36399/gla.p…





New paper from Matt Keeble exploring public acceptability of local planning restrictions on new takeaways around schools. 51% of adults support, 37% neutral, 9% opposed. Thus new proposals are unlikely to be met with substantial public disapproval tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
