Sam Bankmen Fried: authentically evil >"SBF, you seem healthier now. looked like you were cracked out on stimulants before, were you? >"gosh no Tucker. it's because I had Slack open during interviews and there were so many problems at FTX to work on! had me all jumpy! all

Honestly, surprised by the turnout for me. Honor and a privilege. Thanks @GnosisDAO

Use Gnosis Chain to test in production… real economic impact, real world use. If the devs on Gnosis agree, would massively de-risk Ethereum’s upgrade

As someone who was highly critical of Biden and was known to have had the balls to predict a Trump win in 2016 on the JPM rates floor, let me actually give some predictions here: When things get ugly in politics, attitudes harden. I expect that in the short-to-medium term,

We’re proud to announce the acquisition of Gnosis HQ, now rebranded as Gnosis HQ. Headquarters is the leading onchain business account platform and will become the financial operations layer of the Gnosis ecosystem, to accelerate the Gnosis 3.0 roadmap.

Erik Voorhees Well said

Agree with this reasoning. I will be voting no.

Udi Wertheimer It's certainly true that Saylor's size dwarfs the current eth treasury companies. But ETH benefits from the massive tailwind of the world really starting to come onchain - and mostly on eth. The past few years were an onchain nuclear winter, thanks to Gensler and Warren. BTC

Idk man but the real threat to Ethereum isn't the state actually (at least not today). It's the VCs & protocol careerists trying to neuter it into a shiny fintech playground for "safe", compliant DeFi. Hear me out: They don't want unstoppable code. They don't want resistance.

It’s terrifying to me that this verdict is even in doubt. Encryption all over again. Free Roman. Keep code protected speech.

Hahahaha 10/10

Competition is good. Time for banks to start paying yield on deposits. Simple.

Good take. It’s shocking how intelligent people can completely miss obvious counterpoints / use cases because they refuse to change their perspective. Add in some incentive bias (he was wrong, needs a validate the position) and boom, this is where we end up.

Well said. Mark this call, check back in 2050

I will continue to repost these takes until KYC is eliminated. It leaves gaping holes for criminals and creates a horrendous maze of paperwork for law abiding citizens.

Another day, another repost. Anyone who does 30secs of critical thinking knows “reputational risk” was code for “debank whoever we tell you to”

Tagging a bunch of Gnosis delegates here to take a look at my forum comment. I think with edits, we should pass this extension. Stefan George 🦉💳 elbagococina.eth jackgale.eth mrtdlgc.eth 🦉🦇🔊 Lefteris Karapetsas Areta Stake Capital Group @GnosisGuild forum.gnosis.io/t/gip-137-shou…

3/ The second is that there are plenty of types of crime that are not, in fact, related to securities. Murder? Not a security. Burglarly? Not a security. Misrepresentations about a product? Not a security. Punch someone on the subway? Not a security.

Concise and well put

“Bank on gnosis” — catchy