Anne Duffy (@anneduffy49) 's Twitter Profile
Anne Duffy

@anneduffy49

farmer/partner

ID: 3188700137

calendar_today20-04-2015 23:40:06

5,5K Tweet

150 Takipçi

167 Takip Edilen

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 (@ryangerritsen) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If this is who we are supposed to be relying on to get a deal done with Trump, we should be celebrating that Jivani went down there. Imagine being this angry at someone trying to help Canadians? Joly sounds completely incompetent & petty in this clip.

CCMBC 2021 (@2021ccmbc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sharan Kaur Calling Jamil Jivani's Washington trip “theatrics” is what people say when they do not want to engage with facts. It is not analysis. It is a dismissal tactic. Just be honest about what actually happened. A sitting Canadian MP used an existing relationship with the U.S. Vice

Gurveer (@gurvchahal) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I’m going to ask again, what is the point of this panel? It’s just 4 Liberals talking to each other, it’s not insightful to anyone.

The Pleb 🌍 Reporter (@truckdriverpleb) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Jamil Jivani met with Marco Rubio this week It's nice to finally see adults in the room repairing our trade relationship The Canada/USA partnership will be saved and it's thanks to the Conservatives putting partisanship aside to help Mark Carney fix his mess Great job

Jamil Jivani met with Marco Rubio this week

It's nice to finally see adults in the room repairing our trade relationship

The Canada/USA partnership will be saved and it's thanks to the Conservatives putting partisanship aside to help Mark Carney fix his mess

Great job
Vesper (@vesperdigital) 's Twitter Profile Photo

CTV brings on their Chief Political Commentator, the Globe & Mail, a CSIS director and everyone one of them says: "Why are we working with China? They have no credibility! We should be working with our allies the U.S.A!" 🙃

Jeff Joseph (@misterdoublej) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Tom Mulcair on Montreal @ctvnews on Thursday. He discusses how, despite "only" having a security clearance level of a Privy Council member, then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper would disclose top secret information to him "that went beyond [their] respective roles" in Parliament

Redhead Canuck (@canuckredhead) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Kimiko Shibata 🦋 NSICOP and it's lifetime gag order has been struck down by two lower courts now and is before the Supreme Court of Canada. Ask yourself seriously why Trudeau and the Liberal Party needed to impose a lifetime gag order? What secrets are they trying to hide? courthousenews.com/canadas-nation…

Sue 🇨🇦 (@greatbig_sea) 's Twitter Profile Photo

NSICOP is an agency of the executive branch rather than a true parliamentary committee. The Prime Minister has final say over what remains in their public reports. Once cleared, members cannot publicly disclose the classified details they learn. Violating this secrecy can lead

Lee Humphrey (@tleehumphrey) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You can always count on Liberal or NDP partisans to claim Poilievre doesn’t have a security clearance & imply that there must be some nefarious reason. They don’t know & or even try to understand the difference between a security clearance which Poilievre has held for over 20

Kotylak (@kotyjo) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Security clearance explained as if you had the brain power of a typical liberal voter. Okay, kiddo, let’s talk about this like we’re playing with blocks. Pierre is a guy named Pierre Poilievre. He’s like the boss of a big team called the Conservatives in Canada. He wants to be

Dwayne Chomyn, K.C. (@citizen004) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Stephen Kelly Pierre Poilievre has held security clearance for 20+ years—Level I as an MP, upgraded to Level II as a minister under Harper. He still maintains it today. The NSICOP one he skipped is a gag order, not a standard clearance. Facts matter before petitions. #Cdnpoli

cbcwatcher (@cbcwatcher) 's Twitter Profile Photo

James Moore on minority parliaments and a good reason for an election to call an election "When you're less than one year into a mandate, I think Canadian taxpayers, voters, they really, you really need to have a reason to go back to the public." "But look, you know, six of the

cbcwatcher (@cbcwatcher) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Kate Harrison "But if the goal right now is, as the Prime Minister said it was nine months ago, to come up with a new economic and security partnership with the United States, then there's your opening from the President who says he'd like to get back to the table." "And perhaps

Doug Boswell (@boswelldoug) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Bev Oda, a cabinet minister in the Stephen Harper government billed $18 for a glass of orange juice down down south somewhere and the Liberals went ballistic about her ripping taxpayers off. Liberals are hypocrites.

Michael Kovrig (@michaelkovrig) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There’s a difference between diversification and substitution. Canada needs alternatives to overdependence, but replacing U.S. dependence with China dependence would be worse, not better. Any move that weakens coordination with allies carries long-term costs, particularly in