🔥Telegram İfşa

Trump's variation on: "the wrong type of Brexit". Trump says 4 Tory Prime ministers did the "sloppy one". Is it "getting better", though? Really? Are those record high taxes a mirage? Is "frictionless trade" back with its fresher food and lower prices? independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…

The most corrosive issue for the UK is the massive inequality. A close second is the almost total destruction of social mobility. The third is living the Brexit lie, including its enabling of racism, the permanent decline and the shrinking of coffers. theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/j…

There can be few more reckless acts to protect the tax thievery of those that triggered and funded Brexit than this one. Always one last option. And there are forty-seven years of proof it works. Do the right fucking thing and Rejoin the Single Market. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…

Starmer is bootlicking his way to becoming Trump's new poodle. ...On behalf of the Brexit beneficiaries; thieving tax crooks who get to avoid the EU clampdown. The rest of us? We had to give up forty-seven years of EU prosperity and a better future. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

"Ian Murray (Labour Scottish Secretary) stood against Brexit and voted down the Act" "It is total hypocrisy that now he has his feet under the cabinet table, he now backs this legislation and endorses Brexit" About the "Internal Market Act". Or Labour. dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/…

What a pointless waste of time. By two pointless wastes of space. Who only exist to protect the superwealthy. The legalised tax thievery of Brexit, Freeport's etc. Creating a dejected, beaten down country. While they pretend Rejoin isn't a thing. bbc.co.uk/news/live/cx2n…

"UK inflation unexpectedly jumps to 3.6% as food prices rise again" No doubt Badenoch will again blame Covid. No doubt Starmer will ignore the solution with forty-seven years proof: Rejoin. While they lie, obfuscate and distract: WE ALL GET POORER. bbc.co.uk/news/live/c4g8…

This feels more like the deliberate institutionalising of racism to me. Labour baking it into the very fabric of our society. Other things being equal, does a lilac man really need a different amount to live on than a cyan man? If no, why record it? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

Sense. Especially as the super-rich were the only (huge) beneficiaries of Brexit. The ones that saved hundreds of millions by avoiding the EU's clampdown on tax crooks. So now many of them paid less tax than a nurse. But Starmdenoch. Tax crook enablers. theguardian.com/environment/20…

Some self-serving frosty moggs are actually calling for MORE deregulation of finance. From May's "Chequers Deal" to Starmer's "Reset" finance services are never included. We align on food, but aligning on clamping down on tax crooks, a no-go zone? theguardian.com/business/2025/…

From wars about non-existent WMD's to sanctions, much is about protecting the dollar, or petrodollar. I'm not sure if that's what tariffs are about (more funding tax cuts for the mega-rich), but maybe there's more than one purpose? Interesting article. presstv.ir/Detail/2025/07…

They voted to help keep the heads of the poorest and most vulnerable above water. Starmer, meanwhile, protects super-rich thieving tax crooks with Brexit, Freeports etc. Can Labour get back their own party from the Tory Cabal of Cuckoos running Labour? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

I took the poll "More in Common" used to generate their "Shattered Britain" poll results. You can take it too. Scroll down to "Take the test". moreincommon.org.uk/seven-segments/ (Can't argue with this) I am a: