Dr. Kristy Parker
@KPNatsFan
Counsel at Protect Democracy. Former federal civil rights prosecutor @TheJusticeDept, historian, K-State/Oxford/Harvard Law alum, believer in the baseball gods.
ID:787064950317539328
14-10-2016 22:58:01
16,2K Tweet
2,5K Takipçi
817 Takip Edilen
Our team has the key takeaways you need to understand what happened during last week's SCOTUS hearings on presidential immunity and what it could mean for the November election.
📹 Ben Raderstorf recaps it for you ⬇️
Really good analysis of the immunity argument from Steve Vladeck.
I agree with him that the big problem is the Court's apparent desire to write an opinion 'for the ages,' when it should just narrowly resolve this case and leave more difficult questions for another day.
Recently Dr. Kristy Parker joined EWTN News Nightly to provide analysis of the Supreme Court's oral arguments regarding presidential immunity.
Watch the clip below:
“I’m profoundly disturbed about the apparent direction of the court,” J. Michael Luttig told Greg Sargent. “I now believe that it is unlikely Trump will ever be tried for the crimes he committed in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.” newrepublic.com/article/181059…
@judgeluttig: “The conservative justices’ argument for immunity assumes that Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump is politically corrupt and seeks a rule that would prevent future presidents from corruptly prosecuting their predecessors. But such a rule would license all future
Read this from Greg Sargent quoting @judgeluttig. SCOTUS is about to create a “a rule [that] would license all future presidents to commit crimes against the United States while in office with impunity. Which is exactly what Trump is arguing he’s entitled to do.”