If the expert report was prepared in January and Brennan sent the expert the clips to review in April, does that not suggest Brennan intended-in April-to have the report amended mid-trial, in addition to having the expert cite the clips as part of the basis of his expert opinion?

If Welcher doesn't have the information enough to say how John was positioned, how can he then say with a high degree of engineering certainty that his eye, arm, hip and knee was making contact with the Lexus? Why didn't he test it? Why no simulations with that as basis?

RG | LarryLegend No need to call Trooper Paul. They will be allowed to reference him on cross (sit tight). Now more than ever, I would start with the ARCCA witnesses on the defense. Welcher’s “scientific” data in support of his most important opinion is lacking, his confirmation bias is being

One of the problems with Welcher’s “scientific” analysis is that he in essence turned himself into a very unscientific “fact finder” whose task was to assess the credibility of inconsistent witnesses regarding the presence of other vehicles in the path of an SUV allegedly going

Olivia Calling now that Hank will cross on his heavy vehicle expertise and ask if a Lexus LX570 is a semi truck.

Look at AJ pointing out the obvious.

Is the judge going to do anything about the DA's habit of misstating the holdings of case law they cite in their legal papers? That should absolutely raise "grave concerns" with the Court, and should be considered a violation of the rules of professional conduct. That it has

The Trial Channel Suzanne Arundale I can assert to a reasonable degree of Twitter-X certainty that he is just making things up

Lana Del Turtle this is as insane as insane gets as far as discovery gets. Ordering the creation of non-existent evidence under the guise of "discovery." Never seen anything like this.

👀. Very interesting.

How is the DA going to explain that the witness who told the FBI (after 1001 warnings about the consequences of lying) had a vivid recollection of Higgins/Berkowitz alone in the sallyport for an "unusually long" time because Higgins was a witness and then later realized it wasn't

John’s Burner - speaks to FBI - speaks to BPD commissioner - decides what she told the FBI was false Not suspicious at all. Totally normal occurrence. Happens to everyone all the time. ... Oh look! The ice cream truck! Better go brush my teeth! 🙃

Rafferty or Dever?

RG | LarryLegend Didi Norsk2u Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ 🧚🏻‍♀️ Lawferio 🧚🏻‍♀️ On Charge 2, there better be an instruction that in order to find her guilty of “DUI Grievous Injury” the jury MUST believe beyond a reasonable doubt that KR hit JOK with her car. It’s not a simple drunk driving charge. It’s drunk driving and causing injury with her vehicle that

Every day I wake up and realize one thing we should have taken from the Brits rather than leaving behind is having two distinct classes of lawyers. We don’t have to call them “barristers” and “solicitors” but something to keep the nuts from the rest of us.

God, Brennan has no fucking idea what hes talking about right now. A "scissor bite" is a term used to describe the way a dogs jaw is formed and the way the teeth come/sit together.

The Young Jurks LTL Media Aidan Kearney Barros has used a laser to show the area that was completely intact. Almost every juror wrote something down.

Officer Barros just nuked the DA's case and just made the MSP frame entirely possible. This is DEVASTATING to the DA.

Nicholas Barros just struck a deadly blow to the CW’s case on direct by Alan Jackson.

The fact that Barros used Paul Gallagher’s choice phrase (“ABSOLUTELY NOT”) to pierce the heart of the CW’s lies is EXACTLY the poetic justice we have been waiting for!!!!!!!!