The Vintage Read(@vintagereadshow) 's Twitter Profile Photo

One of the most fascinating aspects of Andrew Lownie’s book was the rather weird relationship between and Edward, . I recorded this quite a while ago, however many are viewing it once more…probably a welcome relief from 😂 (I…

account_circle
Duke of Windsor(@dukeofwindsor) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mark Daniel Snyder Alternate, more earth-friendly methods of food production are in everyone’s best interests. And who is going to mobilize such initiatives…at scale? It’s facile to think anything but large organizations (corporations) would be able to accomplish anything like this.

account_circle
Duke of Windsor(@dukeofwindsor) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Christopher D. Cook Adam Nathan • blaze.ai I can simply look out my window to see digging in for failed policy is not working. Is it because you are ideologically opposed to trying new things?

account_circle
Adam Jensen(@Askeladam) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mark Daniel Snyder Qualia al Ghul Duke of Windsor right, so i read this, but you’ve gotten ratio’s so hard the thread is unreadable. i can’t find a single actionable idea out of you. just “we have the technology”

account_circle
Andrew Rivas(@RivasAD) 's Twitter Profile Photo

David R. 🇪🇨🇵🇷 Mark Daniel Snyder Duke of Windsor This is Twitter, so I’ve got 280 characters to convey an idea. Are you implying my “externalities” was an insufficient description for the downsides of our low-cost food supply chain?

account_circle
Duke of Windsor(@dukeofwindsor) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mark Daniel Snyder The value of large corporations is in their ability to accomplish things at scale, and more efficiently (Read: earth-friendly). Corporations are not inherently evil, but problems arise when regulation lags and governments tend to take their eyes off the ball.

account_circle