Historywoman DavidWilson34 🏴 Bea Johanssen Malcolm Cameron Robert Peston The problem with this particular committee is that it doesn't work like any normal court, be that from the Supreme Court to any employment tribunal. Here are a few comments from Lord Pannick KC who is no fan of BJ having acted for Gina Miller to stop prorogation of parliament.
Tricky | #FBPE Sangita Myska Stephen Kinsella Professor Lucy Easthope The Times and The Sunday Times I suspected this from Pannick’s face at his committee hearing… remember these 😆
Sangita Myska The Times and The Sunday Times The very same Lord Pannick that made this short statement about the UK government whilst Johnson was Prime Minister.⬇️
Thank You✨Sangita✨for your excellent radio shows!
.
Sangita Myska Daniela Nadj The Times and The Sunday Times Isn't Pannick also defending Manchester City?
Enjoy that trophy while you can, boys....
Sangita Myska The Times and The Sunday Times One only had to see Lord Pannick's expression at the end of Johnson's testimony to Privileges Committee to realise that Boris Johnson had skewered himself
nameroF maharG Gavin Barwell Parliament is not a court and this 🦘lacks all the procedural and substantial requirements for a fair process, starting from the unprecedented lack of intentionality in the misleading charge. Just read lord Pannick. Here’s a sum up.
Sangita Myska The Times and The Sunday Times Pannick's face said it all during the hearing. He couldn't hide how he felt whilst Johnson was speaking.